Revision summary
Social anthropology grew from intensive fieldwork in small-scale societies. Sociology grew from industrial class, state, and survey. Malinowski versus Durkheim is the textbook origin split. Srinivas and Béteille show the Indian overlap. The wall is departmental, not a law of nature.
Model answer
Introduction
Social anthropology and sociology both study social relations. They grew from different field habits, scales, and colonial histories.
Body
The usual contrasts
- Social anthropology, after Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown, specialised in small-scale, kinship-heavy societies and long fieldwork.
- Sociology, after Durkheim, Weber, and Marx, specialised in industrial classes, the state, and surveys of large populations.
- Method: participant observation versus questionnaire and official statistics, as a crude teaching split.
Why the wall is thin
- M. N. Srinivas brought village India into both rooms. Béteille wrote as sociologist with anthropological closeness.
- Urban ethnography and multi-sited work erased the ‘primitive versus modern’ division.
- In Britain the names marked departments. In India the same village can sit on either syllabus.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SA[Social anthropology] --> FW[Long fieldwork kinship] SO[Sociology] --> ST[State class survey] BOTH[Village India] --> SA BOTH --> SO
Conclusion
The difference is historical method and scale, not two species of fact. Anthropology’s mark remains intensive fieldwork; sociology’s mark remains the large institutional set.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Cultural Relativism
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Is anthropology only tribes?
No. Cities, labs, and offices are now ordinary fields.
-
Does sociology never do ethnography?
It does. The old contrast is a teaching shorthand.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the drawbacks in assuming culture as an 'integrated-closed system in understanding of contemporary society -
2024 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine critically the concept of social stratification as a basis for sustaining social inequality. -
2021 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically evaluate different types of social stratifications with suitable examples -
2015 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Society and Culture.
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Cultural Relativism
The Nature of Culture
Relativism asks that custom be read in its own history. Boas used it against unilinear racial stages. Herskovits and Benedict spread it as method and public teaching. It is a brake on ethnocentrism, not a moral blank cheque. Rights debates mark its political edge.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Lineage and Clan
Kinship
Lineage members can show genealogical links to an ancestor. Clan members share a putative ancestor and often a totem. Lineages nest inside clans in many segmentary systems. Nuer feud and fusion made the distinction famous. Both groups are commonly exogamous.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Totemism
Religion
A totem is an emblem or kin-like species for a group. Durkheim read it as the clan worshipping itself. Lévi-Strauss read it as a system of differences. Taboo and exogamy often travel with the emblem. Indian tribal clans use totems as identity, not as science of animals.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.