Q2(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q2 Q2 →

Discuss the impact of urbanization and feminist movements on family in India.

Topic: Family. Syllabus: 2.4 Family: Definition and universality; Family, household and domestic groups; functions of family; Types of family (from the perspectives of structure, blood relation, marriage, residence and succession); Impact of urbanization, industrialization and feminist movements on family. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Family.

Revision summary

Urban jobs push neolocal residence while property often stays joint. Shah’s point: jointness can survive split houses. Feminist movements targeted dowry, succession, and domestic violence. Laws changed the script faster than everyday kinship. The result is negotiated families, not one modern nuclear standard.

Model answer

Introduction

Urban work and feminist politics have both pressed the Indian family. The joint household did not vanish, but authority, marriage, and care were renegotiated.

Body

Urbanization

  • Jobs, migration, and rented rooms favour neolocal nuclear units, as Gore, Kapadia, and later urban ethnography recorded.
  • Remittances still feed a rural joint estate. Shah argued the joint family persists as property and ritual even when residence splits.
  • Caste endogamy and arranged marriage adapt: matrimonial ads, not a free love market for all classes.
  • Care of the old and the child becomes a crisis when women also work for wages.

Feminist movements

  • From nineteenth-century social reform to 1970s campaigns, feminists named dowry death, domestic violence, and the Hindu Undivided Family as political.
  • Law: Hindu Succession amendments, PNDT, and domestic violence statutes shift, slowly, who owns and who may leave.
  • Shah Bano and later debates showed that gender justice and community law can collide.
  • Women as earners claim voice in the house; the double shift of office and kitchen is the unfinished impact.

Together

  • The city supplies the wage. Feminism names the inequality inside the household. Neither produced a single new family type.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  U[Urbanization] --> N[Neolocal wage]
  F[Feminism] --> L[Law property violence]
  U --> FAM[Indian family]
  F --> FAM

Conclusion

Urbanization splits residence more than it kills kin. Feminist movements politicised dowry, property, and violence. Indian family change is both demographic and legal.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks

    How the study of variation in forms of marriage led to rethinking on the concepts of social reproduction, kinship and family?

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Define urbanization and discuss its impact on family in India with examples.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Discuss the role of marriage regulations in traditional societies in India for strengthening social solidarity.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Discuss how the rules of descent contradict the principles of residence in matrilineal society, mentioning suitable examples?

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Household and domestic group.

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Marriage Regulations and Alliance Theory

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Define family and critically examine the universality of family

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Differences between Social Anthropology and Sociology.

The Nature of Society

Social anthropology grew from intensive fieldwork in small-scale societies. Sociology grew from industrial class, state, and survey. Malinowski versus Durkheim is the textbook origin split. Srinivas and Béteille show the Indian overlap. The wall is departmental, not a law of nature.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Cultural Relativism

The Nature of Culture

Relativism asks that custom be read in its own history. Boas used it against unilinear racial stages. Herskovits and Benedict spread it as method and public teaching. It is a brake on ethnocentrism, not a moral blank cheque. Rights debates mark its political edge.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Lineage and Clan

Kinship

Lineage members can show genealogical links to an ancestor. Clan members share a putative ancestor and often a totem. Lineages nest inside clans in many segmentary systems. Nuer feud and fusion made the distinction famous. Both groups are commonly exogamous.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.