Revision summary
Tylor and Frazer treated religion as explanation and stage. Malinowski tied magic to practical anxiety. Durkheim and Radcliffe-Brown tied rite to the group. Geertz and Turner stress meaning and symbol. Asad warns that ‘religion’ is not a neutral universal box.
Model answer
Introduction
Anthropology has treated religion as error, as social glue, as meaning, and as power. Each approach catches one face of ritual and belief.
Body
Intellectualist and evolutionary
- Tylor’s animism and Frazer’s magic–religion–science ladder treated belief as explanation. The limit is the armchair stage.
Emotional and psychological
- Malinowski tied Trobriand magic to anxiety at the reef. Freud read ritual as neurosis. Useful for motive; thin for public structure.
Sociological
- Durkheim’s sacred and church, Radcliffe-Brown’s rites of solidarity, and Marxist opium-and-ideology readings stress group and class.
- Limit: belief becomes only social cement or only veil.
Symbolic and interpretive
- Turner’s Ndembu symbols and Geertz’s religion as a cultural system of moods and motivations.
- Lévi-Strauss read myth as logic. Risk: the villager becomes a text.
Later critical
- Asad historicised ‘religion’ as a Christian-secular category. Tambiah and Obeyesekere brought practice and person back.
- Feminist and postcolonial work ask whose spirits and whose priesthood.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD REL[Religion] --> TY[Tylor Frazer intellect] REL --> DU[Durkheim social] REL --> GE[Geertz Turner meaning] REL --> AS[Asad category critique]
Conclusion
Approaches to religion run from Tylor’s intellectualism through Durkheim’s church to Geertz’s meaning and Asad’s critique of the category. Use them as a kit, not as one church of theory.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the principles governing production, distribution and exchange in simple societies.
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Which approach should an answer pick?
Name two or three and criticise. A single school will miss either meaning or power.
-
Is Marxism only hostile to religion?
It reads religion as ideology and sometimes as protest. It underplays ritual meaning.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine various anthropological interpretations about the Kula Ring -
2022 · Q5(d) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Shaman, sorcerer and medicine man -
2021 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Animism and Deep Ecology -
2016 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Totemism -
2015 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
How do you relate the concepts of 'Sacred' and 'Profane' in Durkheim's theory of religion with a focus on the role of totem? -
2015 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically examine the Formalists' and Substantivists' views on the applicability of economic laws in the study of primitive societies -
2015 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the difference between emic and etic, and how does the difference derive from the study of language?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Differences between Social Anthropology and Sociology.
The Nature of Society
Social anthropology grew from intensive fieldwork in small-scale societies. Sociology grew from industrial class, state, and survey. Malinowski versus Durkheim is the textbook origin split. Srinivas and Béteille show the Indian overlap. The wall is departmental, not a law of nature.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Cultural Relativism
The Nature of Culture
Relativism asks that custom be read in its own history. Boas used it against unilinear racial stages. Herskovits and Benedict spread it as method and public teaching. It is a brake on ethnocentrism, not a moral blank cheque. Rights debates mark its political edge.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Lineage and Clan
Kinship
Lineage members can show genealogical links to an ancestor. Clan members share a putative ancestor and often a totem. Lineages nest inside clans in many segmentary systems. Nuer feud and fusion made the distinction famous. Both groups are commonly exogamous.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.