Revision summary
Longitudinal method repeats measures on the same children. It reveals tempo and peak height velocity. Tanner’s Harpenden study is the classic. Cross-sections are cheaper but mix early and late maturers. Dropout and secular change are the main limits.
Model answer
Introduction
A longitudinal growth study measures the same children again and again. It is the method that can see tempo, not only size.
Body
How it works
- Height, weight, and skeletal age are taken at fixed intervals on one cohort.
- Tanner at Harpenden showed spurts, peak height velocity, and individual tempo that a one-time survey misses.
- Indian series, such as work associated with ICMR and university auxology units, used mixed-longitudinal designs when pure follow-up was costly.
Contrast and limit
- Cross-sectional studies are cheaper and map a population at one date. They smear early and late maturers together.
- Longitudinal work suffers dropout, secular change during the study, and ethics of repeated X-rays.
- The method is gold for velocity curves; it is poor as a quick census.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD L[Longitudinal] --> S[Same child over time] S --> V[Velocity spurt] C[Cross-section] --> Z[Size at one date]
Conclusion
Longitudinal growth study follows persons through time. Tanner-style velocity is its yield; cost and attrition are its price.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Can a school survey replace it?
A survey gives status. It cannot give a true velocity curve for each child.
-
Why not X-ray every visit?
Radiation and consent limit skeletal-age films. Height remains the workhorse.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.