PMLA IBC Interface Section 32A Immunity — UPSC current affairs 21 September 2026

The Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs examined regulatory friction between asset attachment under PMLA and resolution under IBC.

Section 32A IBC

Statutory bar preventing prosecution of corporate debtor and attachment of its assets for pre-CIRP offences post resolution plan approval.

Proceeds of Crime

Any property derived or obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence under PMLA.

PMLA, 2002 empowers the Enforcement Directorate to attach 'proceeds of crime', while IBC, 2016 aims to maximize asset value and complete time-bound resolution of corporate debtors.
Conflict arose when attached assets of a corporate debtor prevented resolution applicants from taking over debt-laden companies clean of past criminal liabilities.

Section 32A was inserted into the IBC via amendment to grant immunity to the corporate debtor's property from attachment or confiscation for offences committed prior to CIRP initiation.
Protection applies once a resolution plan is approved by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) or results in liquidation, provided control passes to a new, unrelated management.
Personal criminal liability of erstwhile promoters or directors for PMLA offences remains unaffected and continues independently.

Provides commercial certainty to successful resolution applicants, preventing post-acquisition litigation and safeguarding asset realization for financial creditors.

Section 32A of IBC grants immunity to corporate debtor assets from PMLA action post-resolution if management changes.

Examine how harmonious construction between IBC and PMLA preserves commercial asset recovery without compromising anti-money laundering enforcement.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.