Explanation
- A
1 only
1 only. Avoiding short-term foreign debt is the crisis buffer. More foreign banks and full capital-account convertibility add vulnerability.
- B
1 and 2 only
1 and 2 only. Opening the bank door wider is not immunity.
- C
3 only
3 only. Full CAC is the opposite of a shield (1997 / 2013 lessons).
- D
1, 2 and 3
All three. 2 and 3 fail.
Summary. Official key is (a) 1 only. Immunity to a sudden stop comes from not leaning on short-term foreign borrowing. More foreign banks and full capital-account convertibility do not give that shield.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2026 · Q78 · General Studies · 2 marks
The Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany visited India in January, 2026. Which of the following is/are NOT correct in terms of outcomes of this visit? 1. Signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the All India Institute of Ayurveda and the University of Hamburg 2. Signing of a Memorandum of Understanding on Youth Hockey Development between Hockey India and the German Hockey Federation 3. Establishment of a bilateral dialogue mechanism on the Indo-Pacific 4. Opening of an Honorary Consul of Germany in Lucknow Select the answer using the code given below: -
2024 · Q49 · General Studies · 2 marks
With reference to the rule/rules imposed by the Reserve Bank of India while treating foreign banks, consider the following statements: 1. There is no minimum capital requirement for wholly owned banking subsidiaries in India. 2. For wholly owned banking subsidiaries in India, at least 50% of the board members should be Indian nationals. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?