Revision summary
A senior officer’s husband receiving 30% of a pensioner’s monthly pension is a live conflict and a possible offence. Gratitude and care do not erase the appearance or the risk of a sold file. Options range from ignore to leak; both extremes fail duty. The right path is a confidential, recorded inquiry, recusal, and vigilance report. Genuine care can continue without a cash pipe into the controlling home.
Model answer
Introduction
A pensioner is sending a large share of his pension each month to a man whose wife sits as a senior officer in the same pension office. The ethics are conflict of interest, possible corruption, and the vulnerability of an old claimant.
Body
Ethical issues
- Conflict of interest: a senior pension officer’s household is receiving regular money from a pensioner whose file her office controls.
- Possible illicit gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act, dressed as “care” and “gratitude”.
- Undue influence and elder vulnerability: 30% of a monthly pension is not a token sweet; it can be a rent on delayed or threatened papers.
- Appearance of impropriety: even if some care is real, the public would reasonably see a sold desk.
- Hierarchy and fear: the investigating officer must not be captured by the senior’s rank.
- Confidentiality versus cover-up: gossip in the corridor is not an inquiry; silence is not kindness to Mr. Kumar.
- Duty of care to the pensioner: “gratitude” may hide loneliness, fear of file-block, or a family capturing his account.
Options
- Ignore the transfers as a private gift.
- Give an informal warning to the senior officer and close the matter.
- Record the facts, verify bank trails, interview Mr. Kumar away from the couple, and report to the head of office and the CVO or vigilance, while recusing the senior officer from his file.
- Confront the couple in a public scene or leak to the press first.
- Tell Mr. Kumar only to stop paying, without examining whether the office extracted the money.
Option I would choose
- I would choose the documented inquiry and upward report, with recusal and protection of the pensioner.
- Ignoring or a private warning leaves the conflict in place and teaches the office that rank is a shield.
- A press leak first can defame, destroy evidence, and still leave Mr. Kumar unprotected.
- A mere “stop paying” order without inquiry can look like silencing the trail of a possible offence.
- Reasons: law, Nolan integrity, the old man’s autonomy checked in a safe interview, and a speaking file that a court can read.
- If care is genuine, it can continue without a cash pipe into the controlling officer’s home; a lawful gift ceiling and a written disclosure would still be required.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD M[Money to officer household] --> C[Conflict] C --> I[Recorded inquiry] I --> R[Recuse and vigilance]
Conclusion
The core issue is a controlling officer’s household taking a large cut of a pension. I would inquire on record, recuse that officer, protect Mr. Kumar, and report vigilance — not ignore a gratitude story that looks like a rent.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Anger is a harmful negative emotion, it is injurious to both the personal life and the work life. How can it be controlled? Explain.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q16). View answer →
-
What if Mr. Kumar insists he is happy to pay?
Consent under a possible file-threat is weak. Interview him away from the couple, check his other support, and still remove the officer from his file.
-
Can I be insubordinate by reporting the senior’s spouse?
Reporting a conflict is duty, not insult. Use the official vigilance path and keep the noting factual.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q20 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
You hold a responsible position in district. One day in the morning you received a call from the school of your 11-year-old son that you are required to come and meet the principal. You proceed to the school and find your son in the principal's office. The principal informs you that your son had been found wandering aimlessly in the ground during the time classes were in progress. The class teacher further informs you that your son has lately become a loner and did not respond to the questions in the class, he has also been unable to perform well in the football trials held recently. You bring your son back from the school and in the evening along with your wife try to find out the reasons for your son's changed behaviour. After repeated cajoling your son shares that some children had been making fun of him in the class as well as in the WhatsApp group of the student by calling him stunted, stupid and frog. He tells you the names of a few children who were the main culprits but pleaded with you to let the matter rest. After a few days, during a sporting event, where you and your wife have gone to watch your son play, one of your colleague's son shows you a video in which students have caricatured your son. Further, he also points out to the perpetrators who were sitting in the stand. You purposefully walk past them with your son and go home. Next day you find on social media, a video denigrating you, your son and even your wife, stating that you were engaged in physical bullying of children on the sports field. The video became viral on social media. Your friends and colleagues began calling you to find out the details. One of your juniors advised you to make a counter video giving the background and explaining that nothing had happened on the field. You, in turn, posted a video which you had captured during the sports event, identifying the likely perpetrators who were responsible for your son's predicament. You have also narrated what has actually happened in the field and made attempts to bring out the adverse effects of the misuse of social media. (a) Based on the above case study, discuss the ethical issues involved in the use of social media. (b) Discuss the pros and cons of using social media by you to put across facts to counter the fake propaganda against your family. -
2024 · Q15 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
You are a city commissioner. There is a reputed college in your city, which has the maximum number of girl students. The condition of the toilets/washrooms in this college is very poor and pathetic, due to which the girl students have to face many mental, physical and hygiene-related problems every day. The college administration is not paying any attention to these basic facilities of the girl students. As a city commissioner, what steps will you take to improve this basic facility for the girl students and address the indifference of the college administration? -
2020 · Q5 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
An employee was taking a bribe in his office. His officer caught him red-handed. The officer knows that if the employee is dismissed from service, his old parents will become homeless and destitute. Therefore, the officer leaves him with a warning only. Imagine that you are the same officer. What will you do in these circumstances? Discuss in detail. -
2020 · Q20 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
You are a civil servant posted in a State where elections were held recently. To ban the sale of alcohol was the main promise in the election manifesto of the newly elected Chief Minister. To fulfil this promise, the Chief Minister has ordered a total ban on sale and purchase of alcohol in this State. Whether the government should interfere in the matter which is considered by many to be a matter of personal choice? Comment logically. -
2019 · Q10 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following: (A) There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct may face difficulties to yourself and cause problem for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals. (B) When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a preference towards ethical means make no difference. Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits. -
2019 · Q15 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
You are trying to become a P.C.S. officer and after clearing various stages you are now eligible for the personal interview. While on your way to the interview you see an elderly man walking with his grand-daughter. Suddenly the old man suffers a heart attack right in front of you and the grand-daughter pleads with you for help. What will you do? Discuss in detail.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Discuss the role of family, society and educational institutions in inculcating values.
Civil Service aptitude and values
Family plants trust, empathy, and honour through daily example, and can also plant prejudice. Society rewards or punishes those habits in the street, the market, and the media. School adds public reason so a value can be justified beyond the clan. Nai Talim, mid-day meals, and civic assemblies practise equality the lecture cannot. Office ethics overlay these maps; they do not replace them.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Discuss the role of the 'Right to Information' for transparency in governance.
Probity in Governance
RTI converts the citizen’s wish to see the file into a legal claim. Section 4 suo motu disclosure is the ethical heart; applications are the backstop. Second ARC treated RTI as a master key to good governance. Social audits of wages, rations, and contracts rest on that key. Exemptions must stay narrow, and the applicant must be safe, or transparency dies in practice.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
"The requirement of government sanction for prosecuting dishonest officials is a protective shield for corruption." Examine the statement.
Probity in Governance
Prior sanction was meant to protect bona fide official acts from motivated FIRs. Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 of the PC Act are the usual locks. Endless delay, not the lock itself, is the shield for corruption. Second ARC and CVC lines wanted a clock and a reasoned order, including deemed sanction. Reform the timeline and the speaking order; do not abolish every filter.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.