Revision summary
A red-handed bribe is a crime against the citizen, not a private family accident. A warning-only exit teaches the office that pity shields graft. Lawful tracks are seizure, record, vigilance or police, and suspension pending inquiry. Parents need pensions, rations, and kin support — not a killed file. Mercy, if any, is recorded mitigation after process, not an unwritten pardon.
Model answer
Introduction
A red-handed bribe is a crime against the citizen in the queue, not a private family accident. Compassion for the parents is a real duty; concealing the bribe is not compassion, it is a second offence.
Body
Stakeholders and the wrong ‘warning only’
- The caught employee, the payer, other staff watching, the parents, and every later applicant at that desk are stakeholders.
- A warning that leaves the money and the post untouched teaches the office that pity is a shield — Bentham would count the future bribes that silence buys.
- CCS (CCA) Rules and the Prevention of Corruption Act do not make old parents a defence to criminal gratification.
- Kant: if every superior hid a trap case for family hardship, public trust could not be willed as a universal law.
- Gandhi’s talisman asks us to think of the weakest — here that is also the citizen who paid because the desk would not move.
Options
- Do nothing beyond a scolding: cheapest for the officer, costliest for the public; ethically closed.
- Take the cash as ‘evidence’ into a drawer without a record: collusion.
- Record, seize, inform vigilance/police as the law requires, place the employee under suspension pending inquiry, and write a speaking note.
- In parallel, map the parents onto lawful welfare: old-age pension, ration, a relative’s support, and, if rules ever allow, residual family claims — never a secret bargain to kill the case.
- After due process, penalty follows evidence; mercy, if any, is a reasoned, recorded mitigation, not an unrecorded pardon.
What I would do
- I would not ‘leave him with a warning only’. I would secure the scene, record witnesses, start the disciplinary and criminal tracks the statute names, and personally ensure the parents are not abandoned to the footpath by the office’s silence about welfare desks.
- I would also inspect whether I created a climate of targets that made the desk a toll booth — command failure is not an excuse, but it is my extra duty.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD B[Red-handed bribe] --> L[Record and lawful process] P[Parents hardship] --> W[Lawful welfare map] L --> T[Trust of the queue] W --> T X[Warning only] --> C[Second corruption]
Conclusion
Parents’ destitution is a welfare problem the state can still touch. A red-handed bribe is a public crime the officer must not bury. Pity without process is another kind of corruption.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How will you apply emotional intelligence in administrative practices? Explain.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is dismissal mandatory the same afternoon?
No. Due process is mandatory. Informal warning that ends the matter is what ethics forbids.
-
What if the employee is a first offender?
Character and quantum may affect the penalty after inquiry. They do not justify erasing a red-handed bribe from the record.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q20 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
You hold a responsible position in district. One day in the morning you received a call from the school of your 11-year-old son that you are required to come and meet the principal. You proceed to the school and find your son in the principal's office. The principal informs you that your son had been found wandering aimlessly in the ground during the time classes were in progress. The class teacher further informs you that your son has lately become a loner and did not respond to the questions in the class, he has also been unable to perform well in the football trials held recently. You bring your son back from the school and in the evening along with your wife try to find out the reasons for your son's changed behaviour. After repeated cajoling your son shares that some children had been making fun of him in the class as well as in the WhatsApp group of the student by calling him stunted, stupid and frog. He tells you the names of a few children who were the main culprits but pleaded with you to let the matter rest. After a few days, during a sporting event, where you and your wife have gone to watch your son play, one of your colleague's son shows you a video in which students have caricatured your son. Further, he also points out to the perpetrators who were sitting in the stand. You purposefully walk past them with your son and go home. Next day you find on social media, a video denigrating you, your son and even your wife, stating that you were engaged in physical bullying of children on the sports field. The video became viral on social media. Your friends and colleagues began calling you to find out the details. One of your juniors advised you to make a counter video giving the background and explaining that nothing had happened on the field. You, in turn, posted a video which you had captured during the sports event, identifying the likely perpetrators who were responsible for your son's predicament. You have also narrated what has actually happened in the field and made attempts to bring out the adverse effects of the misuse of social media. (a) Based on the above case study, discuss the ethical issues involved in the use of social media. (b) Discuss the pros and cons of using social media by you to put across facts to counter the fake propaganda against your family. -
2024 · Q15 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
You are a city commissioner. There is a reputed college in your city, which has the maximum number of girl students. The condition of the toilets/washrooms in this college is very poor and pathetic, due to which the girl students have to face many mental, physical and hygiene-related problems every day. The college administration is not paying any attention to these basic facilities of the girl students. As a city commissioner, what steps will you take to improve this basic facility for the girl students and address the indifference of the college administration? -
2020 · Q15 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
You are working in the Pension Department as an investigating officer. A retired government employee, Mr. Ashok Kumar, transfers about 30% of his monthly pension every month to Mr. Prem Chopra, whose wife is a senior officer in your pension office. You suspect the money may be illicit gratification. Mr. Kumar claims the payments are gratitude because Prem Chopra and his wife care for him. Identify the ethical issues, options available, and the option you would choose with reasons. -
2020 · Q20 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
You are a civil servant posted in a State where elections were held recently. To ban the sale of alcohol was the main promise in the election manifesto of the newly elected Chief Minister. To fulfil this promise, the Chief Minister has ordered a total ban on sale and purchase of alcohol in this State. Whether the government should interfere in the matter which is considered by many to be a matter of personal choice? Comment logically. -
2019 · Q10 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following: (A) There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct may face difficulties to yourself and cause problem for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals. (B) When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a preference towards ethical means make no difference. Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits. -
2019 · Q15 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
You are trying to become a P.C.S. officer and after clearing various stages you are now eligible for the personal interview. While on your way to the interview you see an elderly man walking with his grand-daughter. Suddenly the old man suffers a heart attack right in front of you and the grand-daughter pleads with you for help. What will you do? Discuss in detail.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Discuss the role of family, society and educational institutions in inculcating values.
Civil Service aptitude and values
Family plants trust, empathy, and honour through daily example, and can also plant prejudice. Society rewards or punishes those habits in the street, the market, and the media. School adds public reason so a value can be justified beyond the clan. Nai Talim, mid-day meals, and civic assemblies practise equality the lecture cannot. Office ethics overlay these maps; they do not replace them.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Discuss the role of the 'Right to Information' for transparency in governance.
Probity in Governance
RTI converts the citizen’s wish to see the file into a legal claim. Section 4 suo motu disclosure is the ethical heart; applications are the backstop. Second ARC treated RTI as a master key to good governance. Social audits of wages, rations, and contracts rest on that key. Exemptions must stay narrow, and the applicant must be safe, or transparency dies in practice.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
"The requirement of government sanction for prosecuting dishonest officials is a protective shield for corruption." Examine the statement.
Probity in Governance
Prior sanction was meant to protect bona fide official acts from motivated FIRs. Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 of the PC Act are the usual locks. Endless delay, not the lock itself, is the shield for corruption. Second ARC and CVC lines wanted a clock and a reasoned order, including deemed sanction. Reform the timeline and the speaking order; do not abolish every filter.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.