Revision summary
The 2011 National Manufacturing Policy wanted manufacturing near 25 percent of GDP and about 100 million extra jobs by 2022. NIMZs, skills, and simpler compliance were the instruments. Make in India (2014) chased FDI and champion sectors; jobs and domestic value addition lagged the slogan. Start-up India (2016) helped recognised start-ups with funds and tax windows, mainly in metro services. None of the three replaces land, power, clusters, and a stable tax-tariff path.
Model answer
Introduction
The National Manufacturing Policy (2011) tried to make factories India’s job engine after a services-led boom. Make in India (2014) and Start-up India (2016) are the later political brands of that same wish: plants, entrepreneurs, and a less hostile inspector. The critique is that slogans moved faster than firm-level jobs and that 2022 targets were missed in spirit even where parks were notified.
Body
National Manufacturing Policy — objectives
- Raise manufacturing’s share of GDP toward about 25 percent by 2022 (from a much lower teens share) so India is not only a services story.
- Create about 100 million additional manufacturing jobs in that window — the employment heart of the policy, not a footnote.
- Notify National Investment and Manufacturing Zones (NIMZs) with plug-and-play infrastructure, easier exit, and skill schools on site.
- Improve technology, green manufacturing, and the share of domestic value addition, including for MSMEs in clusters.
- Simplify labour and environmental compliance through a more predictable, not lawless, regime.
Make in India — critical look
- The 2014 mission invited FDI, eased some licences, and named priority sectors (autos, electronics, defence, pharma, textiles among them).
- It improved India’s ease-of-doing-business rank and some FDI headlines; electronics assembly and defence offsets showed pockets of success.
- Critique: import content stayed high in several champion sectors; regular factory jobs did not match the 100-million language; land, power, and contract enforcement still bind outside a few States.
- It is a brand and a desk, not a substitute for cluster skills and a stable GST-and-tariff path.
Start-up India — critical look
- The 2016 action plan offered DPIIT recognition, a Fund of Funds, some tax holidays, and easier exits for eligible start-ups.
- It normalised entrepreneurship in metros and in software/fintech; incubators and States copied the window.
- Critique: survival rates are harsh; deep manufacturing and rural start-ups remain thin; tax and labour for tiny firms is still a maze; a unicorn is not a mass employer.
- Start-ups complement manufacturing policy; they do not replace a factory that hires ten thousand.
The three files succeed when a plant and a payroll appear, not when a logo is unveiled.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD N[NMP 2011] --> T[About 25 percent GDP 100 million jobs] N --> Z[NIMZ infrastructure] M[Make in India] --> F[FDI sector desks] S[Start-up India] --> E[DPIIT fund tax] F --> J[Factory payroll] E --> J Z --> J T --> J
Conclusion
NMP 2011 aimed at about a quarter of GDP in manufacturing and about 100 million jobs by 2022, via NIMZs and easier compliance. Make in India mobilised FDI and sector desks but left import-heavy assembly and a job gap. Start-up India helped recognised founders more than mass factory work. The objective still stands; the brands are incomplete without clusters and skills.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain Science, Technology and Innovation Policy-2020.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q16). View answer →
-
Did manufacturing reach a quarter of GDP by 2022?
No. The share stayed well below that ambition; the target is the policy’s own measuring stick.
-
Are start-ups the same as manufacturing policy?
No. They can supply tech and some jobs. Mass employment still needs factories and clusters.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q5 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Evaluate the present industrial policy of the Government of India with special reference to ‘Make in India’ and ‘Stand up India’. -
2021 · Q13 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Do you agree with the statement that success of ‘Make in India’ programme depends on the success of ‘Skill India’ Programme and radical labour reforms? Discuss with logical arguments.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What do you understand by "leaving no one behind" with reference to sustainable development goals?
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
Leaving no one behind is the 2030 Agenda pledge to reach the poorest and most excluded first. Averages hide caste, gender, disability, and geography; disaggregated data are required. NITI Aayog’s SDG India Index and Aspirational Districts name lagging units. DBT, Aadhaar, and Jan Dhan try to put transfers in the beneficiary’s account. PM-JAY, POSHAN, PMAY, Samagra Shiksha, and MGNREGA are the large service rails.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What are the objectives of NITI Aayog? Explain its three-years action plan.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
NITI Aayog (2015) replaced the Planning Commission as a think tank, not a Plan-fund body. Objectives: cooperative federalism, SDG monitoring, innovation, and programme design. The Three-Year Action Agenda ran 2017–18 to 2019–20 under a 15-year vision and 7-year strategy. Priorities included jobs, farm income, infrastructure, inclusion, and governance. It was indicative; Union and State budgets still spend, while NITI tracks ranks and districts.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
"Indian food processing industry has not grown with the pace of developed countries." Discuss it.
Food processing
India grows a lot of food but processes a smaller share than developed countries. Thin cold chain, uneven farm lots, slow Mega Food Parks, and compliance costs explain the lag. PMKSY (SAMPADA) funds parks, cold chain, and agro-processing clusters. Operation Greens and food-processing PLI target price crashes and branded scale. FSSAI, FPOs, and e-NAM help quality only when supply contracts exist.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.