Revision summary
Diaspora policy is MEA-led engagement through OCI, Pravasi Bharatiya Divas, and worker portals. The Emigration Act, 1983, MADAD, and Pravasi Bharatiya Bima Yojana target blue-collar protection. India refuses dual citizenship; OCI is a privilege, not a vote. Current stresses are Gulf labour abuse, US visa tightening, and host-country hostility. COVID-19 evacuations showed both the policy’s reach and its capacity limits.
Model answer
Introduction
India’s diaspora policy treats overseas Indians as a strategic, economic, and cultural asset while refusing dual citizenship. It is run mainly by the Ministry of External Affairs after the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs was merged into it in 2016.
Body
Policy
- Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) and the older PIO route (merged into OCI) give a multi-entry life-long visa-like status without political rights.
- Pravasi Bharatiya Divas, the Pravasi Bharatiya Samman, Know India Programme, and scholarship schemes keep political and youth links.
- The Emigration Act, 1983, e-Migrate, MADAD, and Pravasi Bharatiya Bima Yojana protect, unevenly, blue-collar workers especially in the Gulf.
- Remittances, knowledge networks, and consular evacuation (as in COVID-19 Vande Bharat) are treated as national interests, not private travel.
Present challenges for the diaspora
- Gulf workers face wage theft, kafala-type dependence, and sudden layoff; students and H-1B professionals face visa tightening in the United States.
- Racial attacks, hate crimes, and political polarisation in host states, including Khalistan-related tension in some countries, threaten security and image.
- India does not allow dual citizenship; OCI can be cancelled, which creates status anxiety.
- COVID-19 stranded workers and students showed gaps in portable social security and in timely charter capacity.
Link
- Policy is engagement-plus-protection; challenges are labour rights abroad, visa nationalism, and the legal ceiling of OCI.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Indian diaspora] --> P[OCI PBD e-Migrate] P --> E[Engagement and remittances] D --> C[Gulf visas hostility COVID] C --> R[Protection gap] P --> R
Conclusion
India’s diaspora policy is OCI engagement, worker-protection statutes, and diaspora diplomacy without dual citizenship. Present challenges are Gulf precarity, Western visa nationalism, host-country hostility, and the limits of OCI in a crisis.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Comment on India-America "2+2 ministerial dialogue".
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q10). View answer →
-
Can an OCI holder vote in India?
No. OCI is not dual citizenship. Political rights stay with Indian citizenship.
-
Is every NRI covered by the Emigration Act?
The Act targets emigration for work, especially ECR-category destinations. Professionals on ordinary passports use a different consular track.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q2 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
"The President of India cannot become a dictator." Explain. -
2020 · Q4 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
'Article 32 is the soul of the Indian Constitution.' Explain it in brief. -
2020 · Q10 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Comment on India-America "2+2 ministerial dialogue". -
2020 · Q11 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
"Every matter of Public Interest can not be a matter of Public Interest Litigation." Evaluate. -
2019 · Q1 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Describe the objectives and impact of Atal-Bhujal Yojana. -
2019 · Q5 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Write a note on Citizen’s Charter. -
2019 · Q7 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
The philosophy of Indian Democracy is embodied in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. Explain. -
2019 · Q10 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Describe the main provisions of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), 2019.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Explain the concept of Judicial Activism and evaluate its impact on the relationship of Executive and Judiciary in India.
Executive and Judiciary
Judicial activism is gap-filling rights enforcement through PIL and Articles 32, 226 and 142. Cases such as Maneka Gandhi and Vishaka show courts acting where the Executive lagged. The impact is dual: more accountability and more friction over policy and appointments. NJAC (2015) and scheme-monitoring illustrate the strain on separation of powers. The relationship works when decrees are exceptional and the Executive then legislates.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
"The President of India cannot become a dictator." Explain.
Indian Constitution
Article 74 after the Forty-fourth Amendment binds the President to ministerial aid and advice. Shamsher Singh treats the President as a formal head of a parliamentary executive. Ordinance and emergency powers are not personal; they ride on the Council. Five-year tenure, electoral college, and Article 61 impeachment block self-perpetuation. Courts can test whether an act was truly on advice, so dictatorship has no constitutional door.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Critically analyse the role of the Inter-State Council in promoting Co-operative Federalism in India.
Union and the States
Article 263 and the 1990 Presidential Order created the Inter-State Council after Sarkaria. It is a political forum for Centre–State and inter-State coordination, not a court. It can record disputes and recommend; it cannot bind the Union like a statute. Infrequent meetings and a PM-chaired, recommendatory design weaken its role. GST Council and fiscal bodies now often bargain harder than this Council.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.