Revision summary
Article 263 and the 1990 Presidential Order created the Inter-State Council after Sarkaria. It is a political forum for Centre–State and inter-State coordination, not a court. It can record disputes and recommend; it cannot bind the Union like a statute. Infrequent meetings and a PM-chaired, recommendatory design weaken its role. GST Council and fiscal bodies now often bargain harder than this Council.
Model answer
Introduction
The Inter-State Council is the Article 263 forum for Centre–State and inter-State coordination. A critical analysis must ask whether it has actually practised co-operative federalism or remained a rarely summoned talking shop.
Body
Mandate and design
- Article 263 lets the President establish a council to inquire into disputes, discuss subjects of common interest, and make recommendations for better coordination.
- Following the Sarkaria Commission, a Presidential Order in 1990 set up the standing Inter-State Council, chaired by the Prime Minister, with Chief Ministers and Union ministers as members.
- Punchhi Commission later asked for more regular, agenda-driven sittings so that the Council could be the political face of co-operation.
Contribution to co-operative federalism
- It is the only constitutional, political table where States can put Centre–State friction—security, fiscal transfers, and concurrent subjects—on a shared record.
- Recommendations on Sarkaria themes and occasional issue-based meetings have given a language of partnership that NITI Aayog’s executive forums do not fully replace.
Critical limits
- Meetings have been infrequent; the Prime Minister as chair and a recommendatory mandate mean the Union can delay or ignore outcomes.
- GST Council (Article 279A) and Finance Commission channels now carry more real bargain than the Inter-State Council.
- Without a statutory calendar, published follow-up, and equal secretariat support for States, the Council promotes co-operative federalism more in text than in routine practice.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[Article 263] --> I[Inter-State Council 1990] I --> D[Dialogue on common subjects] D --> R[Recommendations] R --> F[Co-operative federalism if followed] I --> W[Weak if meetings rare]
Conclusion
The Inter-State Council is the right constitutional instrument for co-operative federalism, but irregular sittings and a soft mandate have limited its bite. It will promote co-operation only when the Union treats it as a working council, not as an optional summit.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
'Article 32 is the soul of the Indian Constitution.' Explain it in brief.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Can the Inter-State Council settle a river dispute like a tribunal?
No. It may discuss and recommend. Inter-State river disputes follow Article 262 and parliamentary law.
-
Is NITI Aayog a substitute for the Council?
NITI is an executive think-tank. Article 263 is a constitutional political council; the two are not the same office.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q12 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
How does the federal structure in India accommodate the diverse needs and aspirations of different states? Are there any challenges; if yes, then how are they addressed? -
2022 · Q5 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Consider the functions and relations of the Chief Minister and the Governor of State. -
2022 · Q9 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Discuss the causes of Russia-Ukraine conflict. -
2021 · Q12 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
Describing the composition and functions of the Central Vigilance Commission, analyse its limitations. -
2019 · Q9 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Describe the procedure of creation and abolition of Legislative Council in States. Why did the Andhra Pradesh State Assembly pass a resolution to abolish the State’s Legislative Council? Explain in short. -
2018 · Q7 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
In what ways does the Indian federal system differ from the federal system in the United States of America (USA)? Explain. -
2018 · Q14 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
Discuss the reasons, objectives and functions of NITI Aayog and describe the recently reorganised NITI Aayog. -
2018 · Q20 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
Describe the composition and functions of Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.) in India.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Explain the concept of Judicial Activism and evaluate its impact on the relationship of Executive and Judiciary in India.
Executive and Judiciary
Judicial activism is gap-filling rights enforcement through PIL and Articles 32, 226 and 142. Cases such as Maneka Gandhi and Vishaka show courts acting where the Executive lagged. The impact is dual: more accountability and more friction over policy and appointments. NJAC (2015) and scheme-monitoring illustrate the strain on separation of powers. The relationship works when decrees are exceptional and the Executive then legislates.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
"The President of India cannot become a dictator." Explain.
Indian Constitution
Article 74 after the Forty-fourth Amendment binds the President to ministerial aid and advice. Shamsher Singh treats the President as a formal head of a parliamentary executive. Ordinance and emergency powers are not personal; they ride on the Council. Five-year tenure, electoral college, and Article 61 impeachment block self-perpetuation. Courts can test whether an act was truly on advice, so dictatorship has no constitutional door.
Q4 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
'Article 32 is the soul of the Indian Constitution.' Explain it in brief.
Indian Constitution
Ambedkar called Article 32 the soul because rights need a guaranteed court. It is itself a Fundamental Right to move the Supreme Court. The five writs give a constitutional, not merely civil, remedy. It is suspendable only as the Constitution allows, mainly via Article 359. Judicial review under Article 32 is part of the basic structure.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.