Revision summary
Agrarian structure organises land, labour, caste and household. Class forms include owners, tenants, landless and new reverse tenancy. Caste maps onto field labour and honour in the village. Women’s farm work without title is a central inequality. Region and ecology split irrigated surplus growers from dryland and forest poor.
Model answer
Introduction
Agrarian social structure is the organised pattern of land, labour, caste and household in the countryside. Inequality here is not one gap. It is several forms that overlap. Daniel Thorner’s malik, kisan and mazdoor, Béteille’s owners-tenants-labourers, and Dhanagare’s peasant strata give a class language. Caste and gender decide who sits in each class.
Body
Class forms
- Ownership inequality: large holders, medium cultivating owners, petty owners, tenants, and landless labourers. A. R. Desai stressed landlord and peasant class conflict under colonialism and after. Tenancy and sharecropping shift surplus without always shifting title. Reverse tenancy in machine-owning belts is a new class twist: small owners lease out to capitalist farmers. Attached and migrant labour (Breman) is unfreedom as well as poverty. Green Revolution and later horticulture markets widened the gap between surplus growers in Punjab-Haryana-coastal Andhra and dryland smallholders.
Caste and status forms
- Land maps onto jati in many regions: dominant cultivating castes versus Dalit labour. Béteille showed the map is not perfect, which is why analysis needs both dimensions. Untouchability in fields, separate hamlets, and exclusion from well and temple are agrarian inequalities, not extras. OBC assertion and land reform leftovers produced new dominant groups without equality for the landless.
Gender, generation and region
Women work in fields and lack titles; widows and daughters lose land in practice despite the 2005 succession amendment. Girls’ unpaid farm work subsidises male status. Regional inequality—irrigated versus rainfed, hill versus plain, Adivasi forest versus caste village—is agrarian too. Policy (ceilings, tenancy law, MNREGA, PM-KISAN) redistributes unevenly: title-based transfers miss the landless woman.
- Forms, listed: property class, tenancy, labour unfreedom, caste rank, gendered landlessness, and regional-ecological inequality. They stack. A Dalit landless woman migrant is not three separate case studies. She is the structure at its intersection.
Credit, irrigation and markets are further forms. A household with a tube well and KCC sits in a different class from one that buys water. MSP-linked grain belts differ from cash-crop distress belts. Contract farming can look like opportunity and still transfer risk downward. These are agrarian inequalities even when the caste names stay the same.
The 2020–21 farmers’ movement showed cultivator inequality vis-à-vis the state and corporates; it did not erase these internal forms.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD LAND[Land rights] --> CL[Class inequality] TEN[Tenancy and labour] --> CL JATI[Caste rank] --> AG[Agrarian inequality] GEN[Gendered title] --> AG CL --> AG
Conclusion
Agrarian inequality in India takes the forms of class (land, tenancy, labour), caste rank, gendered exclusion from title, and regional-ecological gaps. Thorner and Béteille still name the class skeleton. Caste and gender put flesh on who occupies each bone.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What are pressure groups? Discuss their role in decision-making in democracy
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Did land reform end agrarian inequality?
It weakened some intermediaries and left ceilings, benami and tenancy gaps. Landless labour remains large.
-
Is PM-KISAN an equality measure?
It is a transfer to landholders. It does not address landless labour or most women without title.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Describe the main features of Indian new middle class. How is it different from the old middle class? -
2025 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Industrial class structure is a function of social structure of Indian society." Do you agree with this statement? Analyze -
2024 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changes taking place in the industrial class structure in India. -
2023 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Elaborate the salient features and the role of middle class in India's democracy and development -
2023 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the implications and the impact of globalization in situating the changing agrarian class structure in Indin -
2022 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that the agrarian class structure in India is changing ?Justify your answer with illustrations. -
2022 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the changing nature of industrial working class. -
2021 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the salient features of 'new middle class' in India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What, according to you, are the factors responsible for the continuance of caste system in India? Explain.
Caste System
Caste continues as organisation and ideology, not only as village custom. Ambedkar’s endogamy, Dumont’s hierarchy, and Ghurye’s features still describe marriage, food and stigma. Srinivas showed mobility inside caste; Béteille and Desai linked it to land, class and power. The Constitution and reservations recast caste as a political identity rather than simply erasing it. Markets and cities loosened occupation more than they loosened kinship.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changes taking place in the industrial class structure in India.
Social Classes in India
The older industrial class was a minority organised mill and PSU workforce. Mills declined; contract labour, circular migration and job work expanded. Services and IT added a salariat above a large informal industrial and logistics workforce. Caste and gender still sort who enters secure versus hazardous work. Unions lost the mill colony world and have only partly regrouped.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Is patriarchy a key to understanding different forms of inequalities in Indian society? Elaborate.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Patriarchy is a structure of control over labour, sexuality and status, not only prejudice. Uma Chakravarti’s Brahmanical patriarchy links caste honour to the regulation of women. Ambedkar’s endogamy thesis makes gender central to caste reproduction. Class inequalities run through unpaid care and segmented female work. The state both reforms and reproduces gender through personal law and welfare.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.