Revision summary
Attributional caste scores groups by listed traits such as diet, occupation and ritual. Ghurye and colonial lists exemplify that approach. Interactional caste ranks groups by who gives and receives food, service and honour. Marriott, Dumont and Srinivas made interaction the test of hierarchy. Lived rank can diverge from textbook attributes.
Model answer
Introduction
Attributional studies rank a caste by the traits it is said to possess. Interactional studies rank it by who gives and who receives food, service, women, and honour in daily life. Both describe caste; they do not photograph the same thing.
Body
Attributional approach
- G. S. Ghurye listed features such as segmental division, hierarchy, restrictions on feeding and marriage, civil and religious disabilities, and lack of free occupational choice.
- Census ethnography and many textbooks still score a jati by occupation, diet, dress, and ritual status as if those attributes were a fixed essence.
- The approach is strong for comparison across regions and for legal schedules. It is weak when attributes change while rank stays, or when rank changes while old labels remain.
Interactional approach
- McKim Marriott argued that caste position is produced in transactions: cooked food, raw food, garbage, and ritual service.
- Louis Dumont placed interaction under a binary of pure and impure: who can touch whom is an enactment of ideology, not a list of hobbies.
- M. N. Srinivas’s dominant caste shows that land, numbers, and office can reorder local interaction even when textual attributes stay ‘low’ or ‘high’.
Why the difference matters
- Attribution can freeze a group as vegetarian or priestly while the village already takes its water from another jati’s well on new terms.
- Interaction captures Sanskritization as a change of practice before a change of name, and it captures boycott as a political weapon.
- A full answer uses attributes as claims people make, and interaction as the test of those claims.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[Attributes diet occupation ritual] --> G[Ghurye census lists] X[Food service marriage honour] --> M[Marriott Dumont Srinivas] G --> R[Claimed rank] M --> L[Lived rank]
Conclusion
Attributional caste is a catalogue of traits. Interactional caste is a map of exchanges. Indian sociology needs both, but rank is decided in interaction.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Do you agree with the view of Andre Beteille that India's villages are representative of Indian society's basic civilizational values ? Present a sociological overview
Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q2(a)). View answer →
-
Is Dumont only attributional because he uses texts?
He starts from ideology, but purity is proven in interaction, not only in a list of traits.
-
Which approach helps a fieldworker more?
Interaction: watch who eats together and who refuses. Attributes still help to hear how people describe themselves.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What, according to you, are the factors responsible for the continuance of caste system in India? Explain. -
2024 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What, according to Andre Beteille, are the bases of agrarian class structure in India? Analyse -
2024 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the different forms of untouchability still practised in India? Discuss with suitable illustrations -
2023 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Do you agree with the view of Andre Beteille that India's villages are representative of Indian society's basic civilizational values ? Present a sociological overview -
2023 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Contextualize Louis Dumont's concept of 'binary opposition' with reference to caste system in India -
2022 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
In the context of changing Indian society, how do you view Andre Beteille's conceptions of harmonic and disharmonic social structures ? -
2022 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elaborate on changing nature of caste system with suitable illustrations. -
2022 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the different forms of untouchability in India.
More from this topic
Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the different forms of untouchability still practised in India? Discuss with suitable illustrations
Caste System
Untouchability is practised exclusion on grounds of hereditary pollution, abolished in Article 17 but not in social geography. Forms include water, food, temple, housing, school and marriage bans. Manual scavenging continues despite the 2013 Act. Urban cups, sewers and housing filters are contemporary illustrations. Guru’s humiliation and Ambedkar’s annihilation agenda still describe the structure.
Q2(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What, according to Andre Beteille, are the bases of agrarian class structure in India? Analyse
Caste System
Béteille based agrarian class on land property and labour, not on caste rank. Owners, tenants and agricultural labourers are the main classes in his Tanjore study. Caste, class and power are three interacting dimensions. Ownership, control and labour remain the operational bases. Corporate farming, reverse tenancy and public works modify the actors without cancelling the scheme.
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What, according to you, are the factors responsible for the continuance of caste system in India? Explain.
Caste System
Caste continues as organisation and ideology, not only as village custom. Ambedkar’s endogamy, Dumont’s hierarchy, and Ghurye’s features still describe marriage, food and stigma. Srinivas showed mobility inside caste; Béteille and Desai linked it to land, class and power. The Constitution and reservations recast caste as a political identity rather than simply erasing it. Markets and cities loosened occupation more than they loosened kinship.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.