Revision summary
Srinivas replaced a book view of India with a field view from villages such as Rampura. Structure is observed groups; function is how custom holds them together. Dominant caste and Sanskritization explain local power and mobility inside caste. Westernization and politics add new resources without erasing the village system. Conflict theorists say the method underplays class.
Model answer
Introduction
M. N. Srinivas studied Indian society as a living structure of caste, kinship, and village, not as a book of sacred rules. His structural functionalism asks how parts fit, and how they change without the whole collapsing.
Body
Field view, not book view
- Srinivas opposed an Indological India made only of texts. Rampura showed caste, faction, and ritual as observed relations.
- Structure is the network of groups and statuses. Function is the contribution of a custom to order, as in village festivals that knit patrons and clients.
- He kept Radcliffe-Brown’s concern with solidarity, but he put mobility inside the structure through Sanskritization.
Indian tools of the method
- Dominant caste in Rampura joined land, numbers, and local office; ritual rank alone did not decide who ran the village.
- Sanskritization is a functional path: a jati copies the style of a higher local model and still stays inside caste, rather than leaving it.
- Westernization and the vote add new resources. The village remains a system, but the ranking of parts can shift.
Limit
- A. R. Desai and later conflict sociologists said harmony language underplays class and landlord power.
- Andre Beteille’s Sripuram work kept structure but stressed inequality as disharmony, not as a smooth function.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD FV[Field view Rampura] --> ST[Caste kinship village] ST --> DC[Dominant caste] ST --> SK[Sanskritization] SK --> CH[Change inside structure]
Conclusion
- Srinivas’s structural functionalism is a field method: map groups, show what a custom does, and allow ranked change. It is strongest on caste and village, and weakest if class struggle is treated as noise.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain Leela Dube's concept of "Seed and Earth"
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q1(e)). View answer →
-
Is Srinivas only a functionalist of harmony?
No. Sanskritization and dominant caste are about competition. He still frames change as adjustment of a structure, not as revolution.
-
Does the method deny texts?
It denies that texts are enough. Villagers use texts, but rank is decided in interaction.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain Leela Dube's concept of "Seed and Earth" -
2022 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine GS Ghurye's Indological approach to the understanding of Indian society. -
2022 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the material basis of patriarchy as an ideological system. -
2022 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss Law as an important instrument for women's empowerment. -
2022 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the changing nature of structure of political elites. -
2022 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss recent trends in the structure of migration . -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the dialectics between 'development and environment'. -
2021 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?
More from this topic
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Educational development is the only Panacea for country's all ills and evils." Critically examine the above statement with reference to NEP-2020
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Education is necessary for mobility and anti-caste citizenship but not a solo panacea. NEP 2020 reforms structure, language, vocation and equity on paper. Without teachers, public finance and jobs, it becomes credentialism and a dual private-public system. Caste, land and informal labour reproduce ills that schooling alone cannot dissolve. Phule–Ambedkar were right to start with the school and wrong if we stop there.
Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What are the Private and Public network and support systems operative in Indian society for the aged? Suggest measures to curb down the challenges before care givers of the aged
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Private support for the aged is still mainly kin, plus a small paid-care market. Public support is pensions, NPHCE and the 2007 Maintenance Act, all thin relative to need. Nuclear residence and migration weaken the joint-family guarantee without ending dependence. Caregivers, mostly women, face time poverty and little respite. Measures must combine adequate pensions, home services and gender-equal family law.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Bring out various factors responsible for declining of village Industries in India.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Village industries declined through colonial competition, forest enclosure and the collapse of patronage. Post-independence mill goods, power-looms and plastics continued the squeeze. Credit, GST, and migration now pull youth out of hereditary crafts. Some clusters brand and survive; most artisan households enter informal labour. The process reorders caste occupations, not only GDP shares.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.