Revision summary
Srinivas studied India as an observed village structure, not a book of sacred rules. Function explained how custom held groups together. Desai’s class reading and Beteille’s disharmony expose the harmony bias. The village monograph cannot stand for mill, city, and tribe. Keep the field tools; refuse the closed-system claim.
Model answer
Introduction
M. N. Srinivas’s structural-functional view mapped Indian society as a living village system of caste, kinship, and faction. The critique is not that the field view was useless. It is that harmony language, village closure, and a weak class eye limited what the method could see.
Body
What the perspective did
- Structure was the observed network of groups and statuses, not a varna chart. Function was what a custom did for order, as in Rampura festivals that tied patrons and clients.
- Dominant caste and Sanskritization put mobility inside the system, so change did not have to mean collapse.
- The method corrected G. S. Ghurye’s book view with interaction.
Limits of function and harmony
- A. R. Desai argued that landlord, tenant, and labourer are class relations. Treating them as functions of village solidarity hides surplus extraction.
- Andre Beteille’s Sripuram kept structure but named disharmony: equality as a public value beside ranked caste and class.
- Sanskritization explains ritual climbing. It does not explain annihilation of caste as Ambedkar demanded.
Village as the whole
- Rampura is a powerful case, not India. Town, mill, plantation, and tribe sit outside that frame.
- Women and Dalit labour were often under-seen when the informant was a headman.
Use after critique
- Keep field method, dominant caste, and Sanskritization as tools.
- Add class, gender, and extra-village power.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SF[Srinivas structure function] --> RP[Rampura field view] RP --> DC[Dominant caste Sanskritization] CL[Desai class] --> CR[Critique] BT[Beteille disharmony] --> CR CR --> SF
Conclusion
Srinivas’s structural functionalism is strongest as a field correction to Indology. It is weakest when Indian society is reduced to a self-balancing village. Critique means adding class, disharmony, and the Constitution, not throwing Rampura away.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q1(b)). View answer →
-
Does critique mean Srinivas ignored conflict?
He saw faction and mobility. He still framed them as adjustments of a structure, not as class war.
-
Is the method only functionalist?
It is structural-functional in the Radcliffe-Brown line, rewritten with Indian tools of dominant caste and Sanskritization.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ? -
2017 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ? -
2017 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Indebtedness is one of the serious issues leading to farmers suicides Discuss reasons and suggest solutions -
2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the concepts of dominant caste' and ' vote ' bank giving examples from specific regions -
2017 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give an account of the problems relating to the "creamy layer". -
2017 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss some of the striking issues of development induced imbalances that need urgent attention -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the causes and solutions for the low female sex-ratio in the DEMARU States of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal, and Gujarat ? -
2017 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
To what extent does nation building depends on strengthening of pluralities in Indian society?
More from this topic
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Educational development is the only Panacea for country's all ills and evils." Critically examine the above statement with reference to NEP-2020
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Education is necessary for mobility and anti-caste citizenship but not a solo panacea. NEP 2020 reforms structure, language, vocation and equity on paper. Without teachers, public finance and jobs, it becomes credentialism and a dual private-public system. Caste, land and informal labour reproduce ills that schooling alone cannot dissolve. Phule–Ambedkar were right to start with the school and wrong if we stop there.
Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What are the Private and Public network and support systems operative in Indian society for the aged? Suggest measures to curb down the challenges before care givers of the aged
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Private support for the aged is still mainly kin, plus a small paid-care market. Public support is pensions, NPHCE and the 2007 Maintenance Act, all thin relative to need. Nuclear residence and migration weaken the joint-family guarantee without ending dependence. Caregivers, mostly women, face time poverty and little respite. Measures must combine adequate pensions, home services and gender-equal family law.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Bring out various factors responsible for declining of village Industries in India.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Village industries declined through colonial competition, forest enclosure and the collapse of patronage. Post-independence mill goods, power-looms and plastics continued the squeeze. Credit, GST, and migration now pull youth out of hereditary crafts. Some clusters brand and survive; most artisan households enter informal labour. The process reorders caste occupations, not only GDP shares.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.