Q7(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q6 Q7 →

The problem of displacement is inherent in the idea of development. Analyze the statement critically

Topic: Visions of Social Change in India. Syllabus: Visions of Social Change in India: Idea of development planning and mixed economy; Constitution, law and social change; Education and social change. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Visions of Social Change in India.

Revision summary

Indian planned development has routinely needed other people’s land. Narmada is the public case of dam as growth and as submergence. Adivasi policy debates show protection versus assimilation at the same sites. Displacement is inherent in this model, not in all possible development. Rights, consent and in-situ alternatives contest that inherence.

Model answer

Introduction

Development, as India practised it, has often meant moving people off land so that a dam, mine, mill, or city can stand. Displacement is therefore frequent in that idea. It is not a law of nature. It is a political choice about who counts as the public.

Body

Why the statement is strong

  • Developmental planning treated national growth as a spatial project: reservoirs, steel towns, and highways need empty land that is never empty.
  • Adivasi and peasant tracts become ‘sites’ because Ghurye-style assimilation and a weak property voice meet Elwin’s unprotected people.
  • Narmada made the inherent link public: the dam was development; submergence was the same plan’s other face.
  • Urban slum eviction and SEZ land are the city version of the same idea: improvement requires someone to leave.

Critical limit of ‘inherent’

  • Not every idea of development requires dispossession. Land-saving industry, in-situ slum upgrading, and Forest Rights titles imagine growth with staying.
  • What is inherent in Indian big-project development is a class-caste arithmetic: those with less honour and less paper title pay first.
  • Desai would say displacement is inherent in this capitalist-state path, not in ‘development’ as human flourishing.
  • Yogendra Singh’s modernization can include legal rights as heterogenetic tools against forced exit.

Who is moved

  • Scheduled Tribes, Dalit labour, and women with no recorded title are over-represented among the displaced.
  • Compensation cash without livelihood is not rehabilitation; reverse migration during COVID showed how thin urban alternatives are for the already uprooted.

Politics against inherence

  • Movements, Gram Sabha consent under PESA, and court battles treat displacement as contestable, not as fate.
  • If the idea of development is rewritten as social democracy, staying with resources becomes the test, which Ambedkar’s pairing of social and political democracy would support.

Verdict

  • In the actually existing Indian developmental state, displacement has been structurally normal.
  • The statement is critically true of that model, and false as a metaphysical claim about all possible development.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  DEV[Big-project development] --> LAND[Land for dam mine city]
  LAND --> DIS[Displacement]
  ALT[Rights in-situ FRA PESA] --> NOT[Not fate]
  DIS --> WHO[Adivasi Dalit untitled women]

Conclusion

Displacement is inherent in the Indian big-project idea of development because land is taken from the weak for a national surplus. It is not inherent in every meaning of development. The critical task is to change the idea so that growth does not require an exit.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Education is a key to social development. Elucidate

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Critically examine the relevance of development planning in India

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Analyze the idea of developmental planning in India

    View answer →

  4. 2021 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Explain the sociological significance of the New Education Policy and its thrust on vocationalization and skill development

    View answer →

  5. 2020 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss in detail the main issues of development planning in mixed economy like India

    View answer →

  6. 2019 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Examine the importance of Development Planning in India Mixed Economy, and analyze its problems and prospects

    View answer →

  7. 2018 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    How do you relate the growth of development of metropoles and its impact on the mental and social life of people in India.

    View answer →

  8. 2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Write a note on Education and equality in India.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Caste system studies in India have been dominated by the "book-view" initially, How did the entry of "field-view" bring about a balance in the study of Indian caste system? Discuss

Rural and Agrarian Social Structure

Book-view caste is textual hierarchy and purity ideology. Field-view caste is observed dominant caste, interaction, and split of class and power. Srinivas, Marriott, and Beteille corrected Indology without erasing texts. Balance means values plus village practice. Singh’s modernizing tradition needs both sources.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Ambedkar’s annihilation is destruction of birth-based graded inequality. Temple and dining reform are not enough if scripture still ranks people. Intermarriage, equal law, education and power are the means. Sanskritization is mobility inside caste, not annihilation. Village harmony without equality is not his goal.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Discuss different forms of kinship system in India

Caste System

Karve divided Indian kinship into regional zones, not one national family type. North India leans patrilineal, patrilocal and village-exogamous. South India more often permits close-kin and cross-cousin marriage. Matriliny exists in pockets and is not a footnote. Kinship carries caste endogamy and gender control.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.