Revision summary
Social media accelerates communal polarisation through outrage, forwards and typed enemies. It organises existing honour and majoritarian frames more than it invents them. Riot coordination and humiliation archives are part of its role. Combat needs fact-check, accountable platforms, local rumour control and digital literacy. Offline fraternity and mixed institutions must outcompete the feed.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
Social media is not a communal mind. It is a machine that speeds in-group talk, humiliation, and rumour until a local insult feels like a civilisational war. Its role in polarisation is to organise attention, not to invent every prejudice.
Body
Role in polarisation
- Algorithms reward outrage, so ethnocentric content travels farther than a village argument once did.
- Forward chains and closed groups create echo chambers that confirm Dumont-like us/them purity in a digital idiom.
- Fake videos and identity tags turn Muslims, Dalits, or migrants into instant types, which identity politics of domination exploits.
- During riots and after, social media archives shame and coordinates mobs; Tripura-type FIRs against accounts show the state’s late chase.
- It also lets counter-publics speak. Polarisation is the dominant commercial use, not the only use.
Why it bites in India
- Beteille’s disharmonic society already had ranked honour; the feed supplies daily proof and daily insult.
- Informal youth with phones and insecure jobs are a ready public, as urban slums and campuses show.
- Traditional media and politicians launder social-media frames into ‘public opinion’.
Ways to combat it
- Fast, independent fact-check that is trusted across communities, not only a ministry banner.
- Platform liability for amplification of riot speech, with due process so the tool is not only used on dissent.
- Local peace committees and police that treat rumour as a law-and-order fact, as old riot studies already knew.
- School and NEP-style digital literacy that teaches source doubt without teaching cynicism about all journalism.
- Cross-group offline work: unions, co-operatives, and mixed neighbourhoods reduce the monopoly of the feed over the we.
- Ambedkarite public culture of fraternity is a content strategy, not only a statute.
Limit
- Combat fails if the offline political economy of ethnocentrism is rewarded at the ballot.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SM[Social media amplification] --> R[Rumour honour types] R --> P[Communal polarisation] F[Fact-check literacy local peace] --> C[Combat] CIV[Civic fraternity offline] --> C
Conclusion
Social media polarises by speeding ethnocentric rumour and honour games in a disharmonic democracy. Combat needs platform rules, local rumour control, literacy, and a civic we that is more rewarding than the mob feed.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q1(a)). View answer →
-
Should social media be banned during tension?
Short local curbs have been used. A permanent ban hits livelihood and dissent; rumour then moves to voice notes anyway.
-
Is polarisation only a Muslim–Hindu feed story?
That is the loudest. Caste atrocity videos and regional hate are part of the same machine.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2023 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyse the sociological interconnections between Social Media and Mass Mobilization in India -
2016 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elucidate the concepts of 'majoritarianism' and 'minoritarianism' in accentuating communal tensions in India.
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution
Bring out the debates of 'insiders' and 'outsiders' approaches in understanding Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
• The insider (emic) approach studies Indian society using native categories, sacred texts, and cultural immersion, championed by G.S. Ghurye and D.P. Mukerji. • Critics argue the insider view suffers from upper-caste bias and ignores ground realities in favor of normative texts. • The outsider (etic) approach applies universal models and comparative frameworks, famously used by Western scholars like Louis Dumont. • Critics dismiss the outsider view as orientalist reductionism that imposes Western concepts and misinterprets local idioms. • Modern Indian sociology bridges this binary through a reflexive methodology combining cultural familiarity with analytical rigor. • Ultimately, combining native insights with objective scrutiny is essential to capture India's complex social dynamics.
Q5(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution
Discuss the challenges faced by the aged people in receiving 'elder care'.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
• India's aging population faces severe elder care challenges due to the breakdown of traditional joint families and youth out-migration. • Over 80% of seniors lack formal pensions because they worked in the informal sector, worsening financial vulnerability. • High out-of-pocket medical costs for chronic illnesses quickly drain meager personal savings. • Public hospitals suffer from an acute shortage of geriatric specialists, dedicated wards, and rehabilitation facilities. • Implementation of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 remains weak, leaving legal tribunals overburdened. • Solutions require shifting from a welfare approach to a rights-based framework, combining community care networks with strict legal enforcement under Article 41.
Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution
Compare G. S. Ghurye's and A. R. Desai's approaches used in understanding Indian society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
• **Ghurye’s Indological Approach:** Relied on sacred texts and classical literature to study Indian society through civilizational continuity. • **Core Themes in Ghurye:** Focused on caste, kin, and how Hinduism historically integrated diverse tribal and regional groups. • **Desai’s Materialist Approach:** Rejected textual idealism in favor of Marxist political economy to study social structures. • **Economic Formations:** Analyzed Indian society through successive modes of production—ancient, feudal, and colonial capitalist. • **Caste vs. Class:** Viewed caste and religion as superstructural elements that mask underlying economic exploitation. • **Critique of State and Nationalism:** Argued that the nationalist movement was bourgeois, leaving agrarian inequalities intact post-independence. • **Key Contrast:** Ghurye highlights cultural tradition and integration, while Desai emphasizes economic power and class conflict.