Revision summary
European humanist radicalism is one root of secularism. Indian secularism is equal citizenship among public religions. It is not the decline-of-faith thesis. Disharmony remains between legal equality and ranked honour. The outcome is unfinished where communal violence persists.
Model answer
Introduction
The statement captures a Western story of secularism as humanist revolt against the church. Indian secularism is only partly that outcome. It is also a constitutional arrangement among living faiths.
Body
The European radical strand
- Twentieth-century humanism, rights, and anti-clerical politics treated the person, not the altar, as the measure.
- That radicalism travelled through Indian reformers, Ambedkar’s constitutionalism, and Nehruvian statecraft.
Indian difference
- Here religions did not empty the public square. Secularism meant equal citizenship and principled distance, not the death of ritual.
- Beteille’s disharmonic structure: equality as value, ranked religious honour as fact.
- Ghurye’s civilisational Hindu frame resists a hard split of society from the sacred.
Comment
- Humanistic radicalism is one parent. Plural coexistence and anti-colonial nation-making are the others.
- Communal violence shows the outcome is unfinished.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Humanist radicalism] --> S[Secularism] P[Plural faiths nationalism] --> S S --> C[Constitutional equal citizenship]
Conclusion
Secularism owes a debt to humanist radicalism of the last century. In India it is also a political technology for a multi-religious society. The statement is true as genealogy, incomplete as sociology.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Indian caste system is unique and has been unhealthy for the growth of sociology of India." How far do you agree with this view?
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Is Indian secularism a copy of France?
No. Laïcité is harder on public faith. India bargains with living communities.
-
Did humanism alone make 1950?
Partition and minority fear also wrote the secular clauses.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society. -
2020 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society? -
2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Indian caste system is unique and has been unhealthy for the growth of sociology of India." How far do you agree with this view? -
2020 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss Whitehead's contention that caste has potential to displace class and colonial contradiction. -
2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
"Indian rural society is a faction-ridden society." Discuss. -
2020 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give an account of the consequences and remedies of chronic malnutrition in India. -
2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine Dube's contributions to the study of Indian villages -
2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is caste politics? Substantiate your answer with examples of how identities are defined by caste dynamics
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.