Revision summary
Tribe in India has no single cultural definition. Colonial marks, Ghurye’s Hinduisation and Elwin’s protection compete. Scheduled Tribe is a legal list, not an essence. Some listed groups are peasants; some forest dwellers are unlisted. Definition is a power relation to state and market.
Model answer
Introduction
Defining ‘tribe’ in India is a political and scholarly problem. Census lists, colonial isolation, and Hinduisation theses do not name one people with one culture.
Body
Competing definitions
- Colonial ethnography used isolation, animism, and ‘primitive’ as marks. The 1935 Act then segregated some groups administratively.
- G. S. Ghurye called many tribes backward Hindus. Verrier Elwin stressed distinctness and protection.
- The Constitution uses Scheduled Tribe as a list, not as a sociological essence.
Problems
- Language, forest, and shifting cultivation do not fit all listed groups; some ST communities are peasant or urban.
- Identity assertion for autonomy needs a people; the list can both enable reservation and freeze a colonial label.
- Overlap with caste, as in some plains groups, blurs tribe versus jati.
- Exclusion errors: unlisted forest dwellers miss FRA and reservation.
Sociological caution
- Tribe is a relationship to the state and the market, not a museum type.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD C[Colonial isolation marks] --> L[ST list] G[Ghurye Hinduisation] --> L E[Elwin distinctness] --> A[Autonomy identity]
Conclusion
Definitional problems arise because tribe is at once a colonial category, a Hinduisation debate, and a constitutional schedule. Autonomy politics must use the list without mistaking it for a single culture.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Secularism was an outcome of 20th century humanistic radicalism." Comment on this statement.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Are all Adivasis STs?
Adivasi is a political-cultural claim. ST is a gazette list. They do not always match.
-
Does isolation still define tribe?
Markets and mines have ended isolation for many. The label remains.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Does "economic empowerment" automatically bring about "substantive empowerment" for women ? Briefly describe the main issues in women empowerment in India -
2020 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment. -
2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the colonial policy of segregation of tribes under the Government of India Act, 1935. -
2020 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyze the issues related to the citizenship in contemporary India. Give suitable illustrations. -
2019 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the growing assertion of tribal community for autonomy in India -
2019 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is ethno-nationalism? Examine the critical factors responsible for tribal discontent in India -
2019 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the critical issues of commercialization of higher education in India -
2019 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What is 'social security'? Examine recent security measures adopted by the Government in India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.