Revision summary
Towns grow from rural labour push and industry-service pull. Census towns and natural increase add silent urbanisation. Consequences include informal work, class-split housing and pollution. Concerns are eviction, migrant civic gaps and weak local government. Urbanism remains caste-shadowed, not a clean Wirth city.
Model answer
Introduction
Indian urban settlements grow because agrarian surplus labour, industry, and services pull people into towns. Consequences are a new way of life and a new map of eviction, heat, and informality.
Body
Causes
- Agrarian class change: tiny holdings, Green Revolution labour-saving, and distress push worker-peasants out.
- Planned and unplanned industry, ports, and now IT-services pull them in, the mixed-economy city’s hunger for cheap hands.
- Natural increase inside towns and reclassification of census towns add growth without a mayor’s speech.
- Transport corridors and education dreams thicken Beteille’s middle class in metros.
Consequences
- Wirth-type density and diversity, mixed with jati housing and festival publics.
- Informal work, slums, and gated colonies as one disharmonic urbanism.
- Pressure on water, green cover, and air; heat islands that cook the poor first.
- New civic politics: municipal votes, resident associations, and waste conflicts.
Other concerns
- Urban displacement for projects, the concern of growing eviction dynamics.
- Migrant citizenship without portable rations, exposed in Corona.
- Crime, women’s safety, and POSH-thin informal workplaces.
- Governance lag: 74th Amendment on paper, parastatal real estate on the ground.
- Peri-urban caste-agrarian belts become neither village nor serviced city.
Sociological close
- Urban growth is not a neutral modernisation. It reorganises class, caste, and federal local power.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD AG[Agrarian push] --> U[Urban growth] IN[Industry services] --> U U --> I[Informal gated split] U --> D[Displacement heat]
Conclusion
Urban settlements grow from agrarian push and industrial-service pull. Consequences are opportunity, informality, and ecological stress. Concerns are displacement, migrant rights, and a municipality weaker than the market.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Evaluate the nature and scope of anthropogenic influence on Climate in India and also analyze the environmental movements arising out of it.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is urban growth always development?
It can raise wages. Without tenure and drains it is concentrated vulnerability.
-
Do smart cities answer the concerns?
They can upgrade some infrastructure. They may also speed displacement.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you view the growth of informal sector in india ? -
2022 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss different forms of deprivation associated with slums. -
2021 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Urban slums are sites of social exclusion - explain -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Urban settlements in India tend to replicate its rural caste-kinship imprints. Discuss the main reasons -
2020 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Point out the main causes of child labour' in India. How far the State policies have succeeded in its elimination? -
2019 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elucidate the concerns of growing urban displacement dynamics in India -
2019 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Do you think that 'demonetization' has accelerated the economic growth in India? How do you understand the in formalization of labour, underemployment and gender discrimination in this context? -
2018 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Construct a sociological narrative on the increasing trend of child abuse in India.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.