Q1(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1(a) Q4(a) →

Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India

Topic: Rural and Agrarian Social Structure. Syllabus: Rural and Agrarian Social Structure: The idea of Indian village and village studies; Agrarian social structure — evolution of land tenure system, land reforms. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2019 and Rural and Agrarian Social Structure.

Revision summary

Colonial settlements created landlord, ryot, and village-share grids. Abolition, tenancy laws and ceilings cut intermediaries unevenly. Rich peasants and reverse tenancy recast who commands surplus. Operation Barga and FRA try to title tillers and forest dwellers. Records still lag the field.

Model answer

Introduction

Land tenure in India is the legal story of who commands the surplus. Initiatives have moved from colonial landlordism toward occupancy, ceilings, and still-uneven titles for tillers and forest dwellers.

Body

Colonial grids

  • Zamindari, ryotwari, and mahalwari fixed different rent and record relations. Daniel Thorner later mapped malik, kisan, and mazdoor on that inherited field.
  • Permanent Settlement thickened a rentier layer. Ryotwari still left the small holder exposed to revenue and moneylender.

Reform initiatives

  • Zamindari abolition, tenancy regulation, and ceilings were the Nehruvian triad. A. R. Desai read them as incomplete bourgeois change that strengthened rich peasants more than labourers.
  • Operation Barga recorded bargadars in West Bengal. Some southern tenancy laws protected occupancy; many states left oral leases invisible.
  • Green Revolution and later reverse tenancy recast tenure as capital hiring land, not only as landlord versus serf.

Unfinished tenure

  • Forest Rights Act titles and homestead schemes try to bring Adivasi and landless claims into the record.
  • Fragmentation, benami, and weak mutation mean the map and the field still diverge.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  C[Colonial zamindari ryotwari] --> A[Abolition tenancy ceiling]
  A --> R[Rich peasant reverse tenancy]
  F[FRA bargadar record] --> T[Unfinished titles]

Conclusion

Land tenure initiatives changed the legal top of the agrarian order and thickened a peasant-proprietor layer. Labourers, tenants, and forest dwellers remain the weak end of the record, so tenure is still a political field.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2022 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Explain how land reforms brought about desired agrarian transformation.

    View answer →

  2. 2022 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss the challenges during village studies in India.

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Caste system studies in India have been dominated by the "book-view" initially, How did the entry of "field-view" bring about a balance in the study of Indian caste system? Discuss

    View answer →

  4. 2019 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Define patriarchy. Does it have bearings on women's entitlement in Indian family system ? Explain

    View answer →

  5. 2017 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Compare the north Indian kinship System with the South Indian kinship system

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Significance of Village Studies in Indian Sociology

    View answer →

  7. 2016 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Analyse the major components of Land Reform Acts. Show their effectiveness in curbing rural inequality.

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Give some of the important studies relating to the structural changes in the Indian family system.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

Who is said to be the pioneer of village studies in India? Illustratively describe contributions of some Indian sociologists on village studies. How their approaches are distinct from each other?

Rural and Agrarian Social Structure

Srinivas is the pioneer of intensive village fieldwork in Indian sociology, with Rampura and the dominant caste. Dube’s Shamirpet offered a holistic community study; Majumdar mixed survey and anthropology. Marriott and Dumont–Pocock insisted the village be read through civilisational and ideological categories. Béteille separated caste, class and power as no longer symmetrical. Marxist and political-anthropological village studies further shifted the master variable to surplus and faction.

Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

Do you think that new economic reforms of British rule have disrupted the old economic system of India? Substantiate your answer with suitable examples

Rural and Agrarian Social Structure

The old economy combined peasant agriculture, artisan castes and layered trade, not a frozen idyll. Land settlements monetised revenue and strengthened landlord or state claims on the peasant. Nationalists argued deindustrialisation and drain; revisionists note regional survival and later mills. Socially, craft castes and towns lost patronage and many entered labour markets. Disruption is the right word: the old articulation of field and craft was broken even if not every loom stopped.

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

'Textual perspective is important in understanding of Indian Social System.' Discuss.

Rural and Agrarian Social Structure

The textual perspective explains Indian society through Dharmashastra, epics and related canons. Ghurye and Dumont used that archive to theorise caste as a hierarchical whole. The approach is strong on civilisational categories and weak on labour, gender and local power. Srinivas’s field view and Desai’s Marxism correct the book without discarding it. Texts remain part of the social system because groups still quote them in law and ritual.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.