Revision summary
Green Revolution and machines changed who commands farm surplus. Labour demand fell and work became casual and migrant. Incomplete land reform left labourers weak, as Desai argued. Debt and rainfed exclusion produce poverty beside plenty. New means of production are not the same as rural welfare.
Model answer
Introduction
Rural poverty has not simply fallen because ploughs became tractors. Changing means of production—seed, tube well, machine, and hired labour—have recast who owns surplus and who sells cheap work. For many households, that shift has meant new poverty beside new wealth.
Body
What changed in production
- Green Revolution inputs raised yields in irrigated belts and cheapened older landlord rents in some tracts.
- Tractors, harvesters, and herbicides cut demand for attached labour and for women’s weeding work.
- Land fragmentation, reverse tenancy, and contract farming moved control toward those who command capital, not only those who hold a plough.
Why poverty can rise with ‘modern’ means
- A. R. Desai read incomplete land reform as strengthening rich peasants more than labourers.
- Casualisation and circular migration turn the village poor into a reserve army for town and farm.
- Debt for seed, diesel, and health, as later farmer-suicide belts showed, can pauperise even small owners.
- Drought and rainfed districts missed the input package, so regional poverty gaps widened.
Sociological point
- Means of production changed faster than property rights and social security.
- Caste-land overlap, as in Srinivas’s dominant caste, still decides who captures the machine.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MP[New means seed machine credit] --> RP[Rich peasant surplus] MP --> L[Shed labour migration] L --> PV[Rural poverty insecurity] D[Debt] --> PV
Conclusion
Changing farm technology redistributes surplus. It does not automatically cut rural poverty. Where labour is shed, debt is private, and land remains concentrated, new means of production can increase the poor’s insecurity.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The main objective of socio- religious movement during the colonial rule in India were reforming and synthesizing Hinduism. Write any two such important movements
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Did poverty fall everywhere after HYV seeds?
Headcount poverty fell in some periods and regions. Insecurity, landlessness, and debt poverty still thickened for labour.
-
Is migration a sign of rural success?
Often it is a sign that the village cannot absorb labour after machines and land concentration.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the challenges in Implementing the Rural Development Programmes in India -
2019 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the changing democratic profile of India -
2018 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Has Green Revolution led to the formation of new power elite in rural India? Elaborate your answer. -
2018 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Write a note on Basic Services to Urban Poet (BSUP) and Integrated Housing and Slum Development (IHSD) programme provided for the urban poor. -
2017 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Compare the pressing problems of a dalit poor family living in an urban slum with a similar type of family living in a rural setting -
2016 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for rural development -
2016 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Write a note on the uneven impact of 'Green Revolution' on rural society. -
2015 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Effect of displacement through development on the rural landless and marginal farmers .
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Srinivas studied India as an observed village structure, not a book of sacred rules. Function explained how custom held groups together. Desai’s class reading and Beteille’s disharmony expose the harmony bias. The village monograph cannot stand for mill, city, and tribe. Keep the field tools; refuse the closed-system claim.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Hierarchy still ranks bodies through honour, endogamy, and atrocity. Difference organises caste as political identity and rights. Srinivas’s dominant caste already split ritual rank from local power. Beteille’s disharmony names equality as value beside ranked practice. Public life leans to difference; intimacy still leans to hierarchy.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Indian Islam is regional, often shrine-centred, and internally ranked. Minority status after Partition made community a political fact. Reform and print pushed scriptural uniformity against custom. Caste-like divisions and dargah practice persist. Change is toward a firmer boundary, not toward one identical piety.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.