Revision summary
India’s nation was designed around plurality, not ethnic sameness. Linguistic states, secular citizenship, and tribal schedules are nation-building tools. Ghurye’s Hindu whole and majoritarian culture shrink the republic. Ambedkar made caste equality a national condition. Plurality needs a civic floor; it is not a licence for internal domination.
Model answer
Introduction
Indian nation building has always had to live with plurality of language, faith, caste, and region. Strengthening pluralities is not a luxury extra. It is the extent to which a democratic nation can exist without forcing one civilisational mould. The dependence is high, and it is historically unfinished.
Body
Why plurality is constitutive
- The national movement itself was a coalition, from Champaran peasants to urban lawyers, not a single ethnic people.
- Constitutional secularism, federal lists, and linguistic states treated plurality as design, not as a problem to erase.
- G. S. Ghurye’s Hindu civilisational whole is one nation theory. Adivasi, Muslim, and Dalit self-definitions refuse that reduction.
Extent of dependence
- Language: without linguistic federalism, secessionist pressure rises. Strengthening scripts and schools of many tongues holds the union.
- Faith: principled distance and equal citizenship are nation building; riot and humiliation unbuild it.
- Caste: Ambedkar made annihilation and rights the condition of a real nation of citizens, not a Hindu hierarchy wearing a flag.
- Region and tribe: Fifth and Sixth Schedules, and respect for custom, are how the borderlands join without only military integration.
When plurality is weakened
- Uniform cultural nationalism can mobilise a majority and shrink the nation to a core.
- Yogendra Singh’s synthesis can describe mixing. It should not license swallowing minorities as ‘tradition modernising’.
- Andre Beteille’s disharmony is the actual nation: equality as creed, ranked groups as fact. Politics must civilise that tension.
Limit
- Plurality is not endless fragmentation. A shared civic floor—vote, rights, a common market—must hold.
- Strengthening pluralities means equal dignity, not veto by every sect against every law.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NB[Nation building] --> PL[Language faith caste region] PL --> CV[Civic equality] HN[One-culture mould] --> SH[Shrinks the nation] CV --> UN[Democratic union]
Conclusion
Nation building in India depends to a very large extent on strengthening pluralities as civic equals. A single-culture nation would be a smaller, harsher India. The extent is not total licence for inequality inside groups; it is a union that can bear difference without exile.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain the issue relating to ethnicity and sub-ethnicity
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Does plurality weaken the state?
Unmanaged humiliation weakens it. Recognised plurality has been India’s way of surviving size.
-
Is Hindu culture the nation?
It is one large heritage. The constitutional nation is civic and multi-religious.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society -
2017 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ? -
2017 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ? -
2017 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Indebtedness is one of the serious issues leading to farmers suicides Discuss reasons and suggest solutions -
2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the concepts of dominant caste' and ' vote ' bank giving examples from specific regions -
2017 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give an account of the problems relating to the "creamy layer". -
2017 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss some of the striking issues of development induced imbalances that need urgent attention -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the causes and solutions for the low female sex-ratio in the DEMARU States of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal, and Gujarat ?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Srinivas studied India as an observed village structure, not a book of sacred rules. Function explained how custom held groups together. Desai’s class reading and Beteille’s disharmony expose the harmony bias. The village monograph cannot stand for mill, city, and tribe. Keep the field tools; refuse the closed-system claim.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Hierarchy still ranks bodies through honour, endogamy, and atrocity. Difference organises caste as political identity and rights. Srinivas’s dominant caste already split ritual rank from local power. Beteille’s disharmony names equality as value beside ranked practice. Public life leans to difference; intimacy still leans to hierarchy.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Indian Islam is regional, often shrine-centred, and internally ranked. Minority status after Partition made community a political fact. Reform and print pushed scriptural uniformity against custom. Caste-like divisions and dargah practice persist. Change is toward a firmer boundary, not toward one identical piety.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.