Q7(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q7 Q8 →

Explain the issue relating to ethnicity and sub-ethnicity

Topic: Perspectives on the study of Indian society. Syllabus: Perspectives on the study of Indian society: Indology (G.S. Ghurye); Structural functionalism (M.N. Srinivas); Marxist sociology (A.R. Desai). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2017 and Perspectives on the study of Indian society.

Revision summary

Ethnicity is a political people-hood of language, tribe, or origin. Sub-ethnicity is the inner split of clan, caste, class, or sect. Accords fail when umbrellas hide those splits. Reservation and census freeze some names and omit others. Treat ethnic labels as claims, not as single social structures.

Model answer

Introduction

Ethnicity is a named people-hood of language, region, or origin used for honour and resources. Sub-ethnicity is the split inside that name: clan, sect, caste, or hill versus plain. Indian politics constantly climbs and splits these rungs.

Body

Ethnicity as a claim

  • In the north-east, ‘Naga’ or ‘Mizo’ can organise a nation-like demand against the Indian state.
  • In plains politics, ‘Yadav’ or ‘Maratha’ can work as an ethnicised caste.
  • G. S. Ghurye’s tribe-as-Hindu thesis clashes with ethnic self-definition of Adivasi groups.

Sub-ethnicity as the inner issue

  • A tribal umbrella hides dialect, clan, and religious conversion splits, which then break accords.
  • Caste ethnicity hides gotra and class: creamy layer versus labourers.
  • Kashmiri, Assamese, or Tamil identity contains Hindu–Muslim or caste sub-codes that riots and parties activate.

Issues that follow

  • Who is the authentic native, and who is the migrant, as in Assam’s citizenship fights.
  • Reservation lists freeze some ethnic names and exclude others.
  • Elite brokers speak for a people while sub-groups remain unseen.
  • Andre Beteille’s caution: do not treat a cultural name as a single structure of class and power.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  ETH[Ethnicity people-hood] --> CL[Claim on state]
  SUB[Sub-ethnicity clan caste sect] --> SP[Split of the claim]
  ETH --> SUB

Conclusion

Ethnicity organises solidarity against outsiders. Sub-ethnicity organises inequality and fission inside. The issue for Indian sociology is how the state and parties freeze names, and how those names leak in daily life.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society

    View answer →

  2. 2017 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ?

    View answer →

  4. 2017 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Indebtedness is one of the serious issues leading to farmers suicides Discuss reasons and suggest solutions

    View answer →

  5. 2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Explain the concepts of dominant caste' and ' vote ' bank giving examples from specific regions

    View answer →

  6. 2017 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Give an account of the problems relating to the "creamy layer".

    View answer →

  7. 2017 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss some of the striking issues of development induced imbalances that need urgent attention

    View answer →

  8. 2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are the causes and solutions for the low female sex-ratio in the DEMARU States of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal, and Gujarat ?

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Srinivas studied India as an observed village structure, not a book of sacred rules. Function explained how custom held groups together. Desai’s class reading and Beteille’s disharmony expose the harmony bias. The village monograph cannot stand for mill, city, and tribe. Keep the field tools; refuse the closed-system claim.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Hierarchy still ranks bodies through honour, endogamy, and atrocity. Difference organises caste as political identity and rights. Srinivas’s dominant caste already split ritual rank from local power. Beteille’s disharmony names equality as value beside ranked practice. Public life leans to difference; intimacy still leans to hierarchy.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ?

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Indian Islam is regional, often shrine-centred, and internally ranked. Minority status after Partition made community a political fact. Reform and print pushed scriptural uniformity against custom. Caste-like divisions and dargah practice persist. Change is toward a firmer boundary, not toward one identical piety.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.