Q1(d) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q7(a) Q2(c) →

How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions?

Topic: Caste System. Syllabus: Caste System: Perspectives (G.S. Ghurye, M.N. Srinivas, Louis Dumont, Andre Beteille); Features of caste system; Untouchability — forms and perspectives. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2017 and Caste System.

Revision summary

Gandhi treated untouchability as a moral sin to be cured by service and temple entry. He kept a reformed village and varna ideal. Ambedkar treated it as caste structure needing annihilation, rights, and exit options. Forms moved from satyagraha to parties, conversion, and the Constitution. Contemporary Dalit politics is largely Ambedkarite in perspective.

Model answer

Introduction

Gandhian and Ambedkarite struggles both named untouchability as a wound. They disagreed on what the wound was. Gandhi sought moral reform inside a reformed Hindu whole. Ambedkar sought annihilation of caste as a political structure of graded inequality.

Body

Gandhian form and perspective

  • Harijan work, temple entry, and the spinning wheel treated untouchability as a sin of caste Hindus to be washed by service and self-purification.
  • Village, trusteeship, and varna as occupational duty were kept as an ideal, so the aim was inclusion without destroying the social architecture.
  • Champaran-style satyagraha trained moral pressure; the same method was turned to wells, roads, and temples.

Ambedkarite form and perspective

  • Untouchability was not a blot on an otherwise good dharma. It was the underside of caste, reproduced by endogamy and sacred law.
  • Forms shifted to separate electorates (then Poona Pact contest), conversion, labour and education, and constitutional rights.
  • Annihilation of Caste demanded that the Hindu social order itself be confronted, not only its manners.

After Independence

  • Gandhi’s idiom remains in campaigns of social harmony and some temple-entry rituals.
  • Ambedkar’s idiom organises Dalit parties, Buddhist conversion, and rights litigation.
  • The present struggle uses both streets and courts; the perspective that travels further in law is Ambedkarite.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  G[Gandhi Harijan reform] --> IN[Inclusion in Hindu whole]
  A[Ambedkar annihilation] --> RT[Rights conversion law]
  IN --> ST[Struggle against untouchability]
  RT --> ST

Conclusion

The change is from moral inclusion of Harijans into a purified Hindu village to a rights politics that treats caste as a structure to be broken. Forms moved from satyagraha and service to conversion, statute, and organised assertion.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village.

    View answer →

  2. 2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss.

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are the changes in the cultural and structural aspects of the caste system since independence?

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    How has B.R. Ambedkar identified the features of caste system ? How is it different from the mainstream treatment of caste features ?

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss Andre Beteille account of the relationship between caste, class and power as a change from symmetrical to asymmetrical one.

    View answer →

  6. 2015 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Is caste system changing, weakening or disintegrating in India?

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How far Srinivas Sanskritization is modernizing force or traditionalizing force in understanding the changes in caste system?

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What are the different forms of untouchability still practised in India? Discuss with suitable illustrations

Caste System

Untouchability is practised exclusion on grounds of hereditary pollution, abolished in Article 17 but not in social geography. Forms include water, food, temple, housing, school and marriage bans. Manual scavenging continues despite the 2013 Act. Urban cups, sewers and housing filters are contemporary illustrations. Guru’s humiliation and Ambedkar’s annihilation agenda still describe the structure.

Q2(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What, according to Andre Beteille, are the bases of agrarian class structure in India? Analyse

Caste System

Béteille based agrarian class on land property and labour, not on caste rank. Owners, tenants and agricultural labourers are the main classes in his Tanjore study. Caste, class and power are three interacting dimensions. Ownership, control and labour remain the operational bases. Corporate farming, reverse tenancy and public works modify the actors without cancelling the scheme.

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What, according to you, are the factors responsible for the continuance of caste system in India? Explain.

Caste System

Caste continues as organisation and ideology, not only as village custom. Ambedkar’s endogamy, Dumont’s hierarchy, and Ghurye’s features still describe marriage, food and stigma. Srinivas showed mobility inside caste; Béteille and Desai linked it to land, class and power. The Constitution and reservations recast caste as a political identity rather than simply erasing it. Markets and cities loosened occupation more than they loosened kinship.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.