Q2(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q2 Q2 →

Discuss Andre Beteille account of the relationship between caste, class and power as a change from symmetrical to asymmetrical one.

Topic: Caste System. Syllabus: Caste System: Perspectives (G.S. Ghurye, M.N. Srinivas, Louis Dumont, Andre Beteille); Features of caste system; Untouchability — forms and perspectives. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Caste System.

Revision summary

Symmetry meant the same groups led in caste, class, and power. Sripuram showed that land reform and democracy broke that coincidence. Class can rise without ritual rank; office can move without land. Caste remains, but it is no longer a perfect map of class and power. Disharmony is this mismatch as a historical type.

Model answer

Introduction

Andre Beteille argued that in a traditional setting caste, class, and power sat in a symmetrical stack: the same families ranked high on all three. Land reform, vote, and education made the stack asymmetrical.

Body

Symmetrical past

  • In older Sripuram-type Tanjore, Brahmans could combine ritual rank, land, and village authority.
  • Dumont’s encompassing purity and landlordism could look like one pyramid.

Asymmetrical present

  • Caste rank did not automatically equal class after tenancy change and new occupations.
  • Power shifted toward numerical dominant groups and parties, which Srinivas’s dominant caste already hinted.
  • A poor Brahman, a rich non-Brahman farmer, and a Dalit with a reserved office no longer sit on one line.

Meaning

  • This is disharmonic structure: equality as public value, mismatch as lived fact.
  • The change is not the end of caste. It is the end of a single coincidence of the three axes.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  SY[Symmetrical stack] --> BR[Same families all high]
  AS[Asymmetrical] --> SP[Caste class power split]
  LF[Land reform vote school] --> AS

Conclusion

  • Beteille’s shift from symmetrical to asymmetrical ties is the sociology of democratic India: caste, class, and power still matter, but they no longer duplicate one another.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village.

    View answer →

  2. 2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss.

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions?

    View answer →

  4. 2017 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are the changes in the cultural and structural aspects of the caste system since independence?

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    How has B.R. Ambedkar identified the features of caste system ? How is it different from the mainstream treatment of caste features ?

    View answer →

  6. 2015 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Is caste system changing, weakening or disintegrating in India?

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How far Srinivas Sanskritization is modernizing force or traditionalizing force in understanding the changes in caste system?

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Salient features of A.R. Desai's Marxist Sociology

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Desai applied Marxism to nation, agrarian structure, and the Indian state. Nationalism is read as a bourgeois project in a colonial economy. Village harmony is rejected for landlord–peasant–labour relations. The state and planning are class instruments, not neutral tools. Caste is real but not the first mover in his scheme.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Significance of Village Studies in Indian Sociology

Rural and Agrarian Social Structure

Village studies established the field view against book-view Indology. Rampura and Sripuram supplied core concepts of Indian sociology. They linked caste to land, faction, and later to class and power. They shaped policy talk about rural change. Migration and gender gaps now bound their claim to represent India.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

'Isolationism' as a dominant feature of colonial tribal policy

Tribal communities in India

Colonial policy used excluded areas and inner lines as isolation. The aim mixed protection of custom with forest and frontier control. Isolation was never total; markets and missions entered. Elwin inherited protection; Ghurye attacked it as stagnation. Schedules today still carry this spatial exception.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.