Q4(e) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q4 Q5 →

Differential sex-ratio and its implications.

Topic: Perspectives on the study of Indian society. Syllabus: Perspectives on the study of Indian society: Indology (G.S. Ghurye); Structural functionalism (M.N. Srinivas); Marxist sociology (A.R. Desai). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Perspectives on the study of Indian society.

Revision summary

Differential sex ratio is a deficit of females, sharpest in child counts. Prosperity plus ultrasound plus patriliny produced it. Implications include bride import, trafficking, and gendered violence. Scarcity does not automatically empower women. PCPNDT and succession reform are the policy pair.

Model answer

Introduction

A differential sex ratio means fewer females than males in a population, especially among children in prosperous Indian belts. It implies son preference made demographic, with marriage, violence, and trafficking as aftershocks.

Body

Pattern

  • Child sex ratio decline is worse where ultrasound meets Seed and Earth kinship and dowry.
  • PCPNDT exists because the difference is produced, not natural.

Implications

  • Marriage squeeze, imported brides, and trafficking into low-ratio regions.
  • Surplus young men and honour politics can thicken violence.
  • Women’s bargaining inside the household may not rise; scarcity of wives can increase control.

Sociological reading

  • This is patriarchy as a population fact, not only a family attitude. Human development without gender justice can still buy the test.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  SP[Son preference technology] --> DSR[Differential sex ratio]
  DSR --> MS[Marriage squeeze]
  DSR --> TR[Trafficking violence]

Conclusion

Differential sex ratio is missing girls as a social structure. Implications run from marriage markets to crime. Law and property rights must travel together.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2016 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Salient features of A.R. Desai's Marxist Sociology

    View answer →

  2. 2016 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Patriarchy as a form of dominance.

    View answer →

  3. 2016 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Elucidate the concepts of 'majoritarianism' and 'minoritarianism' in accentuating communal tensions in India.

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Comment on the increasing significance of caste in politics.

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Different forms of Dalit assertion

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q4(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Empowerment through 'Right to Education'

    View answer →

  7. 2016 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Bring out the impact of the declining significance of the agrarian economy.

    View answer →

  8. 2016 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    How is ageing becoming an emerging issue in Indian society ?

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Salient features of A.R. Desai's Marxist Sociology

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Desai applied Marxism to nation, agrarian structure, and the Indian state. Nationalism is read as a bourgeois project in a colonial economy. Village harmony is rejected for landlord–peasant–labour relations. The state and planning are class instruments, not neutral tools. Caste is real but not the first mover in his scheme.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Significance of Village Studies in Indian Sociology

Rural and Agrarian Social Structure

Village studies established the field view against book-view Indology. Rampura and Sripuram supplied core concepts of Indian sociology. They linked caste to land, faction, and later to class and power. They shaped policy talk about rural change. Migration and gender gaps now bound their claim to represent India.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

'Isolationism' as a dominant feature of colonial tribal policy

Tribal communities in India

Colonial policy used excluded areas and inner lines as isolation. The aim mixed protection of custom with forest and frontier control. Isolation was never total; markets and missions entered. Elwin inherited protection; Ghurye attacked it as stagnation. Schedules today still carry this spatial exception.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.