Revision summary
The Green Revolution concentrated in irrigated wheat-rice regions. Rich peasants captured seed, water, and machines. Labour gains were partial and later mechanised away. Caste-land overlap structured who won. Ecology and dryland India show the uneven remainder.
Model answer
Introduction
The Green Revolution thickened grain in irrigated wheat-rice belts and left rainfed India behind. Its rural impact was uneven by region, class, caste, and ecology, not a national farm miracle.
Body
Regional unevenness
- Punjab, Haryana, and western Uttar Pradesh gained surplus, machines, and farmer unions.
- Eastern and dryland tracts stayed with low yield and distress, which later NREGA partly met as a wage floor.
Class and caste
- Proprietary cultivators who could buy water, seed, and credit became a rich-peasant class. A. R. Desai’s incomplete reform met new capital.
- Landless labour gained some days of work, then machines and migrants cut that gain. Thorner’s mazdoor did not become a citizen of the revolution.
- Dominant castes that Srinivas mapped often captured the package. Dalit labour remained at the bottom.
Social and ecological
- Households commercialised; tenancy and reverse tenancy shifted.
- Groundwater, soil, and later farmer suicide clusters showed the ecological bill.
- Women gained transplanting work and lost control as cash and machines masculinised decision.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD GR[HYV irrigation credit] --> RP[Rich peasant belts] GR --> LB[Labour then machines] GR --> EC[Water soil cost] DRY[Rainfed India] --> LAG[Left behind]
Conclusion
- Green Revolution impact was a regional class project: plenty for irrigated proprietors, casual work and ecological cost for others. Unevenness is the sociological fact, not a side effect.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the emerging forms of 'inequalities' and 'acute poverty' as major challenges of social transformation in India.
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Did it end hunger nationally?
It raised buffer stocks. Access for the poor still depended on work and PDS, not on owning the surplus.
-
Was it caste-neutral technology?
Technology followed irrigation and credit, which followed dominant-caste land.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critique the victory narratives of Green Revolution in the context of Indian society -
2018 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Has Green Revolution led to the formation of new power elite in rural India? Elaborate your answer.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Salient features of A.R. Desai's Marxist Sociology
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai applied Marxism to nation, agrarian structure, and the Indian state. Nationalism is read as a bourgeois project in a colonial economy. Village harmony is rejected for landlord–peasant–labour relations. The state and planning are class instruments, not neutral tools. Caste is real but not the first mover in his scheme.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Significance of Village Studies in Indian Sociology
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Village studies established the field view against book-view Indology. Rampura and Sripuram supplied core concepts of Indian sociology. They linked caste to land, faction, and later to class and power. They shaped policy talk about rural change. Migration and gender gaps now bound their claim to represent India.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Isolationism' as a dominant feature of colonial tribal policy
Tribal communities in India
Colonial policy used excluded areas and inner lines as isolation. The aim mixed protection of custom with forest and frontier control. Isolation was never total; markets and missions entered. Elwin inherited protection; Ghurye attacked it as stagnation. Schedules today still carry this spatial exception.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.