Revision summary
Ethnic concerns centre language, region, tribe, and federal share. Religious concerns centre majority-minority honour, law, and riot. Identities are mobilised through census, party, and sacred dispute. Assimilation versus peoplehood is the tribal hinge. The risk is a nation that cannot hold plural selves as equal citizens.
Model answer
Introduction
Ethnic and religious identities in India are concerns of recognition, security, and share in the state. They become dangerous when the nation is imagined as one majority’s home and others as guests.
Body
Ethnic identity concerns
- Language, region, and tribe seek federal voice: state reorganisation, Sixth Schedule, and hill movements.
- Paul Brass and others showed ethnicity as mobilised, not primordial. Jobs, census, and parties activate it.
- Adivasi identity concerns land and the Elwin–Ghurye choice: peoplehood versus assimilation.
Religious identity concerns
- Majority-minority numbers, personal law, and sacred space (Ayodhya as a type) organise fear and honour.
- Communal riot and ghettoisation make religion a security identity, not only a faith.
- Secularism as equal respect versus secularism as distance from religion is itself a conflict.
Shared concerns
- Cross-cutting caste can split both. Ambedkarite identity is neither only religion nor only ethnicity.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ET[Language tribe region] --> F[Federal claim] RL[Religious majority minority] --> C[Communal security] ST[State census party] --> ET ST --> RL
Conclusion
The major concern is not that Indians have ethnic and religious selves. It is that the state and street can freeze those selves into majority rule and minority fear.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How serious is the problem of trafficking against women and children in India?
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is caste ethnic?
Caste can behave as ethnicity in politics. It also remains a ranked Hindu social structure.
-
Does development end identity?
Uneven development often thickens ethnicity as a claim on resources.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the New Education Policy, 2020 aim to eradicate disparities in the system of education in India? -
2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on Ghurye's conception of caste in India -
2019 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is POSH Act? "Identification of tormentor by women at workplace does not come easily even today". Examine the statement with substantive examples from India -
2018 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss development induced displacement in the context of tribal uprising in India. Substantiate your answer with any one detailed illustration from India. -
2017 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reason for the escalation of violence against women in the public domain ? -
2016 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Privatization of education and increasing inequalities -
2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the emerging forms of 'inequalities' and 'acute poverty' as major challenges of social transformation in India. -
2015 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
How serious is the problem of trafficking against women and children in India?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system
Caste System
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.