Revision summary
Towards Equality and rape-dowry campaigns recast middle-class public talk. Law on workplace and family violence is a major impact. Professional work grew; household patriarchy often stayed. Sex selection showed middle-class modernity with son preference. Dalit and informal women marked the class limit of that wave.
Model answer
Introduction
The post-1970 Indian women’s movement, after the Towards Equality shock, hit the urban middle class as law, campus, and household speech. It changed the public language of the middle-class woman more than it equalised her maid.
Body
What changed in the middle class
- Mathura, dowry death, and later Vishaka made rape, stridhan, and workplace harassment middle-class newspaper facts, not only private shame.
- Education and delayed marriage expanded the professional woman, still inside Dube’s seed line for property and care.
- Autonomous groups, SEWA’s different class path, and later NFIW–AIDWA streams taught the middle class a vocabulary of patriarchy.
Limits inside that class
- Honour, arranged marriage, and son preference did not exit the apartment. PCPNDT exists because the middle class bought the test.
- Beteille’s disharmony: equality at work, hierarchy at wedding.
Who was barely included
- Dalit-Bahujan and Muslim women charged that the 1970s–80s leadership was savarna and urban. Informal labour stayed the other India.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD TE[Towards Equality] --> MV[Movement law campus] MV --> MC[Middle-class rights talk] K[Kinship honour] --> MC DW[Dalit informal women] --> GAP[Partial reach]
Conclusion
Post-1970 feminism modernised the Indian middle class’s legal and professional self. It did not dissolve caste kinship in that class, and it left most working-class women to other organisations.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What are the major concerns of ethnic identity and religious identity in India?
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Did feminism break the Indian joint family?
It challenged it in speech and statute. Residence and dowry adapted more than they vanished.
-
Was the movement only middle class?
Its loudest legal wins were. Peasant, Adivasi, and union women had parallel histories.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine Yogendra Singh's thesis on 'Modernization of Indian Traditoion'. -
2020 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Colonial administrators helped to construct the very traditionalism which marked the Indian society as "backward'. Comment critically. -
2019 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you think that the Indian saints have brought about social reform and awareness in Indian society? Explain -
2019 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that social movements are caused by opportunity structures that are generated by media? Why? -
2017 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss Yogendra singh's thesis on Modernization of Indian Tradition. And evaluate its applicability in the present day context -
2017 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What, according to you are the two fundamental axes of social discrimination in Indian society ? Are they changing ? -
2016 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Anti-Brahmanical movements during the colonial period -
2015 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the paradigm of modernization of Indian tradition in analyzing social change in India.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system
Caste System
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.