Revision summary
Merton distinguishes membership groups from non-membership reference groups used as standards. Anticipatory socialisation is rehearsal for a group one hopes to join. Relative deprivation is discontent from comparison, not from absolute want. Digital feeds supply global, curated others for identity performance. Indian caste and coaching publics online show membership and aspiration at once. The theory stays relevant because platforms multiply comparative audiences.
Model answer
Introduction
- Robert K. Merton’s reference group theory asks a simple question: with whom do people compare themselves when they judge who they are and what they deserve? The group need not be one they belong to. In a digital world the comparative other is often a feed of strangers, influencers and curated peers. Identity making online is therefore a Mertonian process of selection, anticipation and relative deprivation, not only a story about gadgets.
Body
Merton’s kit
- A membership group is one the person actually belongs to: a college, a caste association, a workplace. A non-membership reference group is one used as a standard anyway: the civil-service batch one hopes to join, a global lifestyle class seen on Instagram. Anticipatory socialisation is the rehearsal of that group’s tastes and morals before entry, which Merton linked to mobility. Relative deprivation, developed with the American soldier studies and later with W. G. Runciman, is discontent produced by comparison, not by absolute lack. Positive reference groups attract; negative ones are the “not us” against which identity is drawn. George Herbert Mead’s significant others and Erving Goffman’s presentation of self sit beside Merton: identity is always audience-facing.
Digital identity making
Platforms multiply audiences and collapse them. A student in a small town can take a Korean pop fandom, a Delhi coaching-centre aesthetic, or a Silicon Valley founder as a non-membership reference group. Filters, follower counts and “stories” are props for anticipatory socialisation into a desired class or gender performance. Relative deprivation becomes chronic when the comparison set is global and edited. Caste and religious WhatsApp groups work as membership references that police honour, marriage and rumour. Hashtag publics can be negative reference groups for those who define themselves against “woke” or against “tradition”.
- Merton already warned that the wrong reference group can produce anomie: goals are copied without the legitimate means. Digital identity making shows that pattern at speed. The theory remains relevant because it names the comparative mechanism; the platforms only enlarge the menu of others.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SELF[Self] --> MG[Membership group] SELF --> NM[Non-membership reference] NM --> AS[Anticipatory socialisation] NM --> RD[Relative deprivation] FEED[Digital feed] --> NM
Conclusion
Merton’s reference groups, anticipatory socialisation and relative deprivation travel well into the digital world. Identity online is made by choosing audiences and measuring the self against them. The screen did not abolish the social psychology of comparison; it intensified it.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Highlight the main features of historical materialism as propounded by Marx. How far is this theory relevant in understanding contemporary societies? Explain
Next question on this syllabus topic (2025 · Q2(b)). View answer →
-
Must a reference group be a real community?
No. Merton allowed non-membership and even imaginary or statistical others. A digital following can serve that role.
-
Is this only about youth and Instagram?
No. WhatsApp caste groups, professional LinkedIn selves and diaspora feeds are the same comparative mechanism.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Highlight the main features of historical materialism as propounded by Marx. How far is this theory relevant in understanding contemporary societies? Explain -
2025 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations -
2025 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain -
2025 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss -
2024 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What are the 'basic and irreducible' functions of the family as proposed by Talcott Parsons? Explain. -
2024 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Describe the main idea of Max Weber's book, *The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism* as a critique of Marxism -
2024 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically explain the salient features of 'alienation' as propounded by Karl Marx -
2024 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Define the concept of 'gig' economy and discuss its impact on the labour market and workers' social security net
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.