Revision summary
Globalization reorganised work through cross-border value chains and lean contracts. Indian IT, garments, SEZs, and platforms show a split of secure core and flexible margin. Informalisation, precarity, feminised export work, and migration are the main patterns. Marx’s reserve army and Standing’s precariat read the discipline of wages. Formalisation of the mass of Indian labour did not follow growth.
Model answer
Introduction
Economic globalization is the tightening of trade, finance, and production across borders. In the twenty-first century it has changed where work is done, how contracts are written, and who bears risk. The pattern is not one story of more jobs everywhere. It is a split between a small secure core and a large flexible margin.
Body
What changed in the organisation of work
- Global value chains locate design in some countries and assembly in others, which Gary Gereffi and others mapped as buyer-driven and producer-driven chains.
- Export processing, special economic zones, and business-process outsourcing moved routine tasks to cheaper labour, including large Indian IT and call-centre employment after the 1990s reforms.
- Just-in-time production and lean staffing borrowed Taylorist control without Taylor’s promise of a high industrial wage for the mass of workers.
- Finance and retail concentration press suppliers to cut labour cost, which informalises work at the bottom of the chain.
Patterns of employment
- Informalisation: a large share of Indian workers remain without written contracts, which the ILO and Indian labour statistics record as the normal form, not a residue.
- Precarity: Guy Standing named a class of workers with unstable hours, no career ladder, and thin social security.
- Platform and gig work: ride-hail and delivery apps classify workers as partners, which shifts social-security cost off the firm.
- Feminisation of some export and care chains, with women in garments and electronics on short contracts, while unpaid care at home is unchanged.
- Skill polarisation: high returns to a narrow professional layer, and deskilling or stagnant pay in routine services.
- Migration: internal and international labour moves to construction, care, and logistics, with remittances as household wage.
Theoretical reading
- Marx’s reserve army is visible as a global pool that disciplines local wages.
- Weber’s market class situation now includes cross-border competition for the same task.
- Frank’s underdevelopment thesis is too simple as a total law, but the hierarchy of design versus assembly still organises employment chances.
- Castells described a network enterprise. The network is real. So is the exclusion of those off the node.
What did not happen
- Full formalisation of the Indian workforce did not follow growth.
- A global equalisation of wages did not occur. Gaps between cores and margins remain.
- Trade unions lost coverage in many tradable sectors even as new worker associations appear in platforms.
Explanation in sum
- Twenty-first century employment under globalization is more cross-border, more contractual at the top, and more informal and platform-based at the margin.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Economic globalization] --> V[Global value chains] V --> C[Core secure professional] V --> M[Margin informal gig] R[Reserve army across borders] --> M F[Finance and lean production] --> M
Conclusion
Economic globalization changed employment by stretching production across chains, expanding informal and gig contracts, polarising skill, and using a global reserve of labour. Indian IT and garment work show the split. Marx, Standing, and chain analysis explain the pattern better than a story of uniform job creation.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Do you think that the social media has brought significant changes in the forms of protest? Argue your case
Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q7(b)). View answer →
-
Did globalization only destroy jobs?
It created export and service jobs and destroyed or informalised others. The net is a changed pattern, not a single loss figure.
-
Is gig work the whole of twenty-first century employment?
No. It is a visible new form. Public jobs, factory jobs, and farm work still employ large numbers, often under new chain pressures.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does the dramaturgical perspective enable our understanding of everyday life? -
2023 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is reference group theory a universally applicable model? Elucidate -
2023 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What, according to Robert Michels, is the iron law of oligarchy? Do lions folly and foxes in Vilfredo Pareto's theory, essentially differ from each other? Substantiate -
2023 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do you assess the changing patterns in kinship relations in societies today? -
2023 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Do you think that common sense is the starting point of social research? What are its advantages and limitations? Explain -
2023 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Highlight the differences and similarities between totemism and animism -
2023 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the relevance of corporate social responsibility in a world marked by increasing environmental crises -
2023 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze critically David Morgan's views on family practices
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Sociology
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer
Sociology
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.