Revision summary
Patriarchy is male dominance across household, work, and state. It shapes development by hiding care, skewing property, and producing capability failure. Sen, NFHS, SHGs, and feminized labour show mixed gains and a double day. Parsons and modernisation underplayed this structure. Inclusive development must reorganise care and voice, not only output.
Model answer
Introduction
Patriarchy is a system of male dominance across household, work, sexuality, culture, and the state. Social development is the expansion of capabilities, security, and participation. The relation is not accidental. Development that leaves patriarchy intact is a partial and often self-blocking process.
Body
Patriarchy as structure
- Sylvia Walby named six structures of patriarchy. Ann Oakley made unpaid housework visible as a development variable, not a private leftover.
- Friedrich Engels tied women’s subordination to property and the monogamous family. The household still reproduces labour-power without a wage.
- Sandra Harding’s standpoint: development indicators written from a male public actor miss care, mobility, and violence.
How patriarchy shapes development
- Human development: Amartya Sen’s missing women and capability failure show that growth can coexist with sex-selective harm. NFHS sex ratio, anaemia, and agency items are the Indian dashboard.
- Education and fertility can rise while property and office stay male. That is stratified development.
- Labour: feminization of work and SHGs expand women’s market presence and can intensify the double day.
- Political development: reserved panchayat seats include women and still meet proxy representation where kin patriarchy holds.
- Environmental and displacement projects, as in Narmada, distribute costs through male land title and female livelihood in commons.
How development can unsettle patriarchy
- Schooling, own income, and law against domestic violence shift bargaining.
- Public care, land in women’s names, and enforcement of inheritance are structural, not sermon, counters.
- They do not automatically win. Backlash in honour politics and in online misogyny is also “change”.
Theoretical caution
- Parsons treated the family as latency for the system; that functional story naturalises patriarchy as development’s helper.
- Modernisation theory expected patriarchy to fade with industry. It reappears in gig ratings, caste endogamy, and office glass ceilings.
- World-system development can use cheap female labour in garments as a competitive edge, which Frank would read as a gendered periphery.
Understanding, stated
- Patriarchy is a constraint on whose development counts.
- Social development that is inclusive has to reorganise care, property, and voice, not only raise GDP.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD PAT[Patriarchy] --> CARE[Unpaid care property violence] DEV[Social development] --> CAP[Capabilities voice security] CARE --> UNQ[Unequal development] CAP --> CHAL[Can unsettle patriarchy] CHAL --> PAT
Conclusion
Patriarchy organises the household, labour, and state so that social development is unequally distributed. Oakley, Walby, Engels, Harding, and Sen make that relation thinkable. NFHS, SHGs, panchayat proxies, and Narmada show it. Development without a shift in patriarchy is growth with a male face.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Does GDP growth reduce patriarchy by itself?
No. Growth can buy sex selection and cheap female labour. Law, property, and care policy have to change too.
-
Are SHGs a sufficient anti-patriarchal development tool?
They can raise voice and income. They do not by themselves transfer land, stop violence, or end unpaid care.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the role of science and technology in addressing age-old taboos and superstitions -
2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment. -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change. -
2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment. -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate. -
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario. -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. -
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Delimit the scope of sociology in relation to other social sciences.
Sociology
Sociology studies patterned relations among groups and institutions as a whole. Comte, Durkheim, Weber, and Marx named that object in different ways. Economics, political science, psychology, history, and anthropology cut the same life along one axis. Census and NFHS already show large-scale social structure. The limit is complementary science, not a takeover of every neighbouring field.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does a researcher achieve objectivity in interpretative research?
Sociology as Science
Interpretative research studies meaning, not only counts. Weber kept value-relevance in problem choice and demanded value-discipline in proof. Harding’s strong objectivity names the researcher’s location. Geertz, prolonged fieldwork, triangulation, and respondent checks test the reading. Empathy without evidence is not objectivity.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment.
Social Change in Modern Society
Information is a report; data are information organised for a research question. Durkheim turned official suicide counts into sociological data by classification. Blumer warned that grids can freeze living meanings. Census and NFHS are public information until a defined indicator is built. Numbers alone do not make data.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.