Revision summary
NSM theory: movements struggle over identity and the quality of life, not only wages. Touraine, Melucci, and Habermas named historic actors, networks, and the lifeworld. Environmentalism fits as defence of nature and livelihood against system projects. Chipko and Narmada illustrate Indian forms. Guha and world-system critique stop a purely post-material reading.
Model answer
Introduction
Environmentalism is a politics of nature, risk, and livelihood that often sits outside the old union-and-party map of class. The new social movements approach, after Alain Touraine, Alberto Melucci, and Jurgen Habermas, explains it as identity, culture, and civil-society action in post-industrial or post-colonial public spheres.
Body
What the NSM approach claims
- Touraine treated movements as struggles over the historic quality of social life, not only over wages. The actor names a self against a dominating apparatus.
- Melucci stressed submerged networks, identity, and information as resources. The movement is a message about how we shall live.
- Habermas placed new movements as defences of the lifeworld against system steering by money and administrative power.
- Offe and others contrasted them with old labour movements: cross-class membership, non-party forms, post-material or risk issues.
How this explains environmentalism
- Chipko in the Himalaya combined livelihood, gender, and forest as a moral community, not a classic strike for pay.
- The Narmada Bachao Andolan named displacement, river, and alternative development against a large-dam state-and-capital project.
- Silent Valley and later climate marches mix science, identity of “the affected”, and media spectacle.
- Membership is often students, peasants, women, and professionals in shifting coalitions, which Melucci’s networks fit.
Indian and Southern twist
- Ramachandra Guha distinguished environmentalism of the poor from Northern post-material ecology. NSM tools still work if livelihood is kept inside identity, not treated as a luxury value.
- Andre Gunder Frank and Wallerstein remind us that forests and dams sit in a world-system of extraction. NSM culture talk must not erase that.
- SHG and local resource groups can be quiet environmental actors without a national banner.
Limits of the approach
- Old organisations, unions, and parties still carry green demands. The “new” is not a clean replacement.
- State repression and caste in movement leadership need conflict theory beside identity theory.
- Global climate NGOs can professionalise and lose the NSM grassroots that Melucci prized.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NSM[New social movements] --> ID[Identity networks] NSM --> LW[Lifeworld versus system] ID --> ENV[Environmentalism] LW --> ENV ENV --> CH[Chipko Narmada]
Conclusion
New social movements theory explains environmentalism as identity, networks, and defence of the lifeworld against system projects. Chipko and Narmada are the teaching cases. Keep Guha’s environmentalism of the poor and world-system extraction in the same frame, or the approach becomes a Northern lifestyle story.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Illustrate with examples the role of pressure groups in the formulation of social policies.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is environmentalism only a middle-class post-material cause?
Not in India. Guha’s environmentalism of the poor is livelihood first, identity second, still readable with NSM tools.
-
Do NSMs replace class?
They add culture and identity. Dams and mines still distribute class costs.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Democracy needs a vibrant culture of civil society in order to strengthen its foundation of citizenship. Comment. -
2024 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Underline the role of social media in contemporary social movements and describe its challenges -
2023 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How is civil society useful in deepening the roots of democracy? -
2022 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Analyse the nature of transition from ideology to identity politics in India. -
2022 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples the role of pressure groups in the formulation of social policies. -
2021 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Explain how political parties and pressure groups are dialectically related to each other in terms of achieving their goals -
2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain democracy as an order of society. What are the factors preventing people's participation in politics? -
2020 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine how social movements come to an end. Illustrate with examples.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Delimit the scope of sociology in relation to other social sciences.
Sociology
Sociology studies patterned relations among groups and institutions as a whole. Comte, Durkheim, Weber, and Marx named that object in different ways. Economics, political science, psychology, history, and anthropology cut the same life along one axis. Census and NFHS already show large-scale social structure. The limit is complementary science, not a takeover of every neighbouring field.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does a researcher achieve objectivity in interpretative research?
Sociology as Science
Interpretative research studies meaning, not only counts. Weber kept value-relevance in problem choice and demanded value-discipline in proof. Harding’s strong objectivity names the researcher’s location. Geertz, prolonged fieldwork, triangulation, and respondent checks test the reading. Empathy without evidence is not objectivity.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment.
Social Change in Modern Society
Information is a report; data are information organised for a research question. Durkheim turned official suicide counts into sociological data by classification. Blumer warned that grids can freeze living meanings. Census and NFHS are public information until a defined indicator is built. Numbers alone do not make data.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.