Revision summary
Marriage remains sacred for most as ritual, honour, and endogamy. NFHS and Census show near-universal marriage. Live-in law and companionate ideals thin the halo for some. Karve’s kinship still gates the sacred circle. Comment: continued sacred core; contractual margin; gendered policing.
Model answer
Introduction
Sacred here means set apart, ritually charged, and morally obligatory. In India, marriage remains widely sacred as honour and sacrament for many communities. Law, live-in judgments, and delayed urban weddings have desacralised it for a minority. The institution continues, with a thinner halo in some classes.
Body
Continuity of the sacred
- Census and NFHS still show near-universal marriage, especially for women, and strong stigma of never-marrying.
- Caste endogamy and wedding ritual keep Durkheim’s sacred–profane split around the knot.
- Irawati Karve’s kinship systems still organise who may marry.
Cracks
- Courts on live-in unions treat some households as legal without a full rite.
- Divorce, delayed marriage, and the new middle class’s companionate talk, after Anthony Giddens, thin the sacrament into a contract.
- Inter-caste and across-region marriages profane older sacred boundaries even when a wedding occurs.
Comment
- Sacred for the majority as honour; legally more contractual than before.
- Not dead. Not untouched.
- Gendered sacredness still polices women more than men.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MAR[Marriage] --> SAC[Ritual honour endogamy] MAR --> CON[Contract live-in delay] SAC --> MAJ[Majority sacred] CON --> MIN[Urban legal margin]
Conclusion
Marriage continues to be sacred in Indian society as a mass honour rite and a kinship rule. Comment: the sacred persists, while law and urban class practice add a contractual edge. NFHS universality and live-in case law can both be true.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the new labour codes and their impact on formal and informal labour in India.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Does a lavish wedding prove sacredness?
Display can be status, after Veblen. Sacredness is the moral interdict, not only the spend.
-
Is love marriage profane?
It may profane caste sacredness and still be sacralised with a full rite.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss. -
2020 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
According to Durkheim, "The major function of education is the transmission of society's norms and values." Discuss. -
2020 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In the context of globalisation, has the scope of sociology been changing India ? Comment. -
2020 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What are the problems in observing social facts in Durkheim's views? -
2020 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
According to Mills, "Elites rule in institutional terms rather than psychological terms." Comment. -
2020 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically assess the Marxian theory of 'Alienation'." -
2019 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.