Q4(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q2(b) Q1(b) →

Critically assess social mobility in closed and open systems.

Topic: Stratification and Mobility: Concepts. Syllabus: Stratification and Mobility: Concepts — equality, inequality, hierarchy, exclusion, poverty and deprivation; Theories of social stratification — Structural functionalist, Marxist, Weberian; Dimensions — Class, status groups, gender, ethnicity and race; Social mobility — open and closed systems, types, sources and causes. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Stratification and Mobility: Concepts.

Revision summary

Mobility: movement across class, status, or power. Closed systems: birth, endogamy, honour; Sanskritisation as group style. Open systems: achievement ideology and actual status attainment. Critique: Bourdieu, gender, caste, and class close the open school. Measure tables; do not trust the label.

Model answer

Introduction

Social mobility is movement across ranks of class, status, or power. Pitirim Sorokin distinguished vertical and horizontal, individual and group. Closed systems tie rank to birth. Open systems tie it to achievement. Real societies mix, so assessment must be critical.

Body

Closed systems

  • Caste, estate, and racial caste-like orders restrict marriage and occupation.
  • M. N. Srinivas’s Sanskritisation is group mobility of style, not an open individual market.
  • Max Weber’s status closure explains how honour survives a wage.

Open systems

  • Industrial class societies promise school-to-job mobility. Peter Blau and Otis Dudley Duncan measured status attainment.
  • The promise is never pure. Pierre Bourdieu’s cultural capital closes the “open” school.

Critical assessment

  • India: reservations open some doors; endogamy and informal labour close others. Census education tables show both.
  • Gender: women’s mobility through jobs can coexist with hypergamy rules. NFHS still maps constrained movement.
  • Openness can be ideological, as Davis and Moore’s functionalism made unequal reward look necessary.
  • Karl Marx: even open markets rest on a class that is hard to leave across generations.

Verdict

  • Closed and open are poles. Mobility exists in both, of different kinds.
  • Assessment: measure intergenerational tables, then name the closures that the word “open” hides.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  CL[Closed] --> ASC[Ascription endogamy]
  OP[Open] --> ACH[School market]
  ASC --> GM[Group style mobility]
  ACH --> REP[Bourdieu reproduction]
  MIX[Real societies] --> CL
  MIX --> OP

Conclusion

Closed systems restrict individual vertical mobility and allow some group mimicry. Open systems increase occupational movement and still reproduce class, caste, and gender through school and honour. Sorokin, Weber, Bourdieu, and Srinivas are the assessment kit. Do not take the label “open” as a completed fact.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2021 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Critically examine Max Weber's theory of Social Stratification.

    View answer →

  2. 2021 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Explain the concept of social mobility. Describe with suitable illustrations how education and social mobility are related to each other

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Explain the emerging challenges in establishing gender equality in the informal sector

    View answer →

  4. 2020 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    How are Hierarchy and Exclusion the major impediments in the transformation of societies ? Discuss.

    View answer →

  5. 2019 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss

    View answer →

  6. 2019 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Modernization presupposes class society; however caste, ethnicity and race are still predominant. Explain

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Why is gender dimension of social stratification ? How does gender intersect other dimensions of inequality based on caste, class, race and ethnicity ?

    View answer →

  8. 2018 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What is the difference between natural and social inequality examples from caste and class dimensions

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Does the structural-functionalist perspective on social stratification promote a status quo? Give reasons for your answer.

Stratification and Mobility: Concepts

Davis and Moore treat unequal rewards as devices to fill important positions. Parsons ties ranking to a shared value system and role allocation. That logic easily sanctifies the present hierarchy as necessary. Tumin asked who defines importance and why talent and reward match so neatly. Unpaid gendered labour and caste inheritance expose the payoff story. Merton’s dysfunctions qualify equilibrium but do not make functionalism a conflict theory.

Q3(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

Compare capability deprivation approach with that of social capital deprivation in understanding chronic poverty

Stratification and Mobility: Concepts

Sen’s approach defines poverty as capability deprivation, not income shortfall alone. Functionings are beings and doings; capabilities are the real set of lives one can choose. Social capital is networks, trust and norms in Coleman, Putnam and Bourdieu, unequally held. Chronic poverty lasts because freedoms stay contracted or because bridges to work and credit stay closed. Dense caste bonding can coexist with capability failure. Indian SHGs, migration networks and multidimensional poverty measures illustrate the comparison.

Q1(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Is the social stratification theory gender-blind? Elucidate.

Stratification and Mobility: Concepts

Marx, Weber and Davis–Moore mapped class, status, power and function, usually with a male default. Gender-blindness means treating the household as a unit and unpaid care as non-economic. Hartmann, Walby, Oakley and Acker made patriarchy a structure of stratification. Crenshaw’s intersectionality warns against adding gender as an afterthought. Indian work on Brahmanical patriarchy and Dalit feminism shows caste and gender as one field. The elucidation is critical but not a dismissal of class analysis.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.