Revision summary
Civil society: associations and publics between family and state. Gramsci, Tocqueville, and Habermas are the frame. Indian S&T engagement: people’s science, Bhopal, dams, GM, trials, RTI. Unequal scientific capital limits who sits on committees. Consultation is not yet co-decision.
Model answer
Introduction
- Civil society is associative life between family and state: unions, movements, professional bodies, and publics that argue. Antonio Gramsci placed hegemony there. In India it has also knocked on the laboratory door.
Body
Civil society
- Alexis de Tocqueville saw associations as schools of democracy. Jürgen Habermas pictured a public sphere of critical talk.
- It is not only NGOs. Uncivil groups also organise. The test is public argument, not a registration certificate.
Engagement with S&T policy
- People’s science movements, the Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad, and later right-to-information work asked that expertise be accountable.
- Campaigns on Bhopal, big dams, GM crops, nuclear siting, and drug trials forced environmental and ethical review.
- Patient groups and disability networks entered medical technology debates. Farmers’ groups contested seed law.
Limits
- Donor-led NGOs can thin into project talk. The state may consult and still decide.
- Scientific capital, as Bourdieu would say, is unequally held. Informal labour rarely sits on expert committees.
Note
- Engagement is real in EIA hearings, PILs, and open-data fights. It is uneven in who speaks for “the people”.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CS[Civil society] --> PUB[Public argument] CS --> ST[S and T policy] ST --> CAM[Bhopal dams GM trials] LIM[Expert closure] --> ST
Conclusion
Civil society is organised public life outside office and kin. In Indian S&T policy it has forced accountability on disaster, dams, seeds, and trials. Gramsci and Habermas frame the hope. Capture and expert closure frame the limit.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critique A.G. Frank's 'development of underdevelopment'
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is a think tank civil society?
It can be a public voice. It can also be a state or corporate satellite. Look at funding and audience.
-
Does protest anti-science?
Much Indian engagement demands better science and consent, not a return to mystery.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario. -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. -
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation. -
2020 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Technology has accelerated the process of development and dependency. Discuss. -
2017 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Assess the role of mass media as an agent of social change -
2017 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine any two theories of social change in detail society -
2017 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically analyse the role of science and technology in bringing about social change -
2016 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Social conflict is both a cause and a consequence of social change." Explain.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline
Sociology
Sociology emerged when industry, the state, and revolution made society a problem. Enlightenment comparison and Saint-Simon–Comte positivism supplied permission. Nisbet’s conservative themes of community and authority also fed the field. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber turned the name into a discipline. Census offices made method a public craft.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss
Stratification and Mobility: Concepts
Davis and Moore: unequal rewards fill important roles; the device is unconscious. Tumin: importance is politically defined. Marx and Weber add exploitation, status, and party. Caste and gender close talent before sorting begins. Use the thesis for incentives; do not use it as a full theory of inequality.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?
Sociology
Fetishism of commodities: social relations among producers appear as relations among things. Exchange-value hides labour time as price. The illusion is socially real, not a personal superstition. Lukács extended it as reification. Gig pay and piece-rates still carry the appearance.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.