Revision summary
Tönnies, Durkheim, Weber, and Marx hit contract, differentiation, bureaucracy, and class. Community, anomie, the iron cage, and the commodity still travel. They under-predicted caste, gender, and religious-national re-enchantment. Treat the classics as types, not closed forecasts. Modernity is their order plus ascriptive returns.
Model answer
Introduction
Ferdinand Tönnies, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx each drew a type of modernity: association, organic solidarity, rationalisation, and capitalism. They predicted well on the large drift. They missed how caste, gender, and new media would re-enchant and re-ascribe.
Body
Hits
- Tönnies’s shift from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft names urban contract, yet community did not die; it relocated in caste associations and apps.
- Durkheim’s differentiation and the cult of the individual still fit exams, rights, and occupational codes. Anomie also still fits.
- Weber’s bureaucracy, calculation, and iron cage describe the office and the platform algorithm.
- Marx’s commodity, class, and world market remain the grammar of informal and formal work.
Misses
- None centred gender as Ann Oakley later required. Care work still holds modernity up.
- Indian modernity kept caste, which their European types under-predicted.
- Religious revival and nationalism re-enchanted what Weber thought would thin.
- Consumer identity and new middle-class style, after Bourdieu, sit beside class polarisation.
Critique
- They predicted the character of a capitalist-rational order better than they predicted its cultural leftovers and returns.
- Use them as types, not as finished prophecy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Tonnies Gesellschaft] --> MOD[Modern character] D[Durkheim organic] --> MOD W[Weber rationalisation] --> MOD M[Marx capitalism] --> MOD RET[Caste gender revival] --> GAP[Under-predicted]
Conclusion
The four predicted differentiation, contract, bureaucracy, and class with lasting accuracy. They under-predicted ascription, gender, and sacred politics. The character of modern society is their map plus those returns. Critique the prophecy, not the tools.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Why is gender dimension of social stratification ? How does gender intersect other dimensions of inequality based on caste, class, race and ethnicity ?
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Were they only pessimists?
Marx hoped for emancipation. Durkheim hoped for new morals. Weber was colder. Tönnies mourned community.
-
Does India falsify them?
It qualifies them. The office and the market arrived without a full melt of jati.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Present a sociological review on the 'new middle class' -
2019 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate -
2019 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Compare and Contrast the contributions of Marx and Weber on social stratification in capitalist society -
2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism -
2018 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain Durkheim's basic arguments on suicide. Can you analyse high suicide rates of contemporary Indian society with Durkheim's theory? -
2018 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Evaluate if social stratification is functional for society. -
2018 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is the difference between anomie in Merton and Durkheim? Explain. -
2018 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Schooling does not ensure upward mobility of all members of this society. Discuss with reference in class societies.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline
Sociology
Sociology emerged when industry, the state, and revolution made society a problem. Enlightenment comparison and Saint-Simon–Comte positivism supplied permission. Nisbet’s conservative themes of community and authority also fed the field. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber turned the name into a discipline. Census offices made method a public craft.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss
Stratification and Mobility: Concepts
Davis and Moore: unequal rewards fill important roles; the device is unconscious. Tumin: importance is politically defined. Marx and Weber add exploitation, status, and party. Caste and gender close talent before sorting begins. Use the thesis for incentives; do not use it as a full theory of inequality.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?
Sociology
Fetishism of commodities: social relations among producers appear as relations among things. Exchange-value hides labour time as price. The illusion is socially real, not a personal superstition. Lukács extended it as reification. Gig pay and piece-rates still carry the appearance.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.