Revision summary
Davis and Moore: unequal reward places talent in important roles. Tumin: tautology and wasted talent. Marx and Weber: class exploitation and status closure. Caste and unpaid care invert the functional premise. A placement function in some jobs does not justify inherited hierarchy.
Model answer
Introduction
Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore argued that stratification is functional because unequal reward places the talented in important roles. Evaluation must test that claim against waste, conflict, and honour systems such as caste.
Body
The functional claim
- Some positions are more necessary and harder to fill.
- Unequal prestige and pay motivate training.
- Stratification is thus a device of placement, not a mere injustice.
Critiques
- Melvin Tumin: barriers of birth waste talent; the theory is tautological about “importance”.
- Karl Marx: stratification is exploitation, functional for a class, not for “society”.
- Max Weber: status honour can block the market the functionalists need.
- Caste in India assigns rank by birth. M. N. Srinivas’s Sanskritisation is group mimicry, not open sorting.
- Gender: unpaid care, after Ann Oakley, is vital work with low reward, which inverts the Davis-Moore premise.
Partial use
- Some credential races do sort skills in modern labour markets.
- That is compatible with large non-functional residues of ascription.
Verdict
- Stratification is functional for reproducing a given order.
- It is not shown to be functionally necessary in its actual, inherited form.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DM[Davis Moore] --> F[Placement function] TUM[Tumin Marx Weber] --> CRIT[Waste exploitation honour] CASTE[Caste gender] --> CRIT F --> PART[Partial in labour markets]
Conclusion
The Davis-Moore thesis overstates a placement function and understates birth, caste, gender, and class power. Stratification can coordinate a division of labour. That does not make existing hierarchies the optimal or just device for society as a whole.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What is the difference between anomie in Merton and Durkheim? Explain.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q3(c)). View answer →
-
Without inequality, would no one train for medicine?
Motivation can be honour, public pay, and vocation. Extreme inherited inequality is not required.
-
Is all critique Marxist?
No. Tumin and feminist care arguments are not the same as surplus-value theory.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism -
2018 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain Durkheim's basic arguments on suicide. Can you analyse high suicide rates of contemporary Indian society with Durkheim's theory? -
2018 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is the difference between anomie in Merton and Durkheim? Explain. -
2018 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Schooling does not ensure upward mobility of all members of this society. Discuss with reference in class societies. -
2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How can Parsons' AGIL framework be used to analyse key problems is a society? Discuss. -
2018 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is labour commitment? Discuss it with reference to studies of manufacturing industry. -
2018 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"The sociological imagination enables us to grasp SOCIOLOGY and biography and the relationship between the two in society." - C.W.Mills . Explain. -
2018 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
In what way did Durkheim perceive religion as functional to society?
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.