Revision summary
Frank: underdevelopment is produced by metropolitan linkage, not delayed take-off. This wrecks Rostow’s stages and names drain. Wallerstein generalised the insight. East Asian states and internal class limit a frozen satellite. Critique: keep linkage; reject one-fate delinking.
Model answer
Introduction
Andre Gunder Frank argued that satellite economies are made poor by their ties to metropolitan capitalism. Underdevelopment is produced, not a waiting room before take-off. The thesis hit modernisation theory. It also over-smoothed history.
Body
The claim
- Surplus is drained through colonial and neo-colonial trade. The core develops; the periphery is underdeveloped.
- Latin American cases were his field. Immanuel Wallerstein later widened this to a world-system.
What the critique gets right
- W. W. Rostow’s stages ignored empire. Frank made dependency a structure, not a culture of laziness.
- Indian deindustrialisation debates and later unequal terms of trade sit in this neighbourhood.
Limits
- Bill Warren and some Marxists said capitalism can still industrialise the periphery. East Asian developmental states challenge a frozen satellite.
- The thesis underplays internal class, caste, and the state, which Fernando Henrique Cardoso’s dependent development partly restored.
- Agency of peasants, unions, and postcolonial planning vanishes if only the metropole acts.
- Culture and gender are thin in the drain model.
Verdict
- Keep the production of poverty through linkage.
- Drop the implication that delinking is the only door and that all peripheries share one fate.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CORE[Metropolis] --> DRAIN[Surplus drain] DRAIN --> UND[Underdevelopment] EA[East Asian paths] --> CRIT[Limits of freeze] INT[Internal class state] --> CRIT
Conclusion
Frank’s development of underdevelopment correctly attacked staged modernisation. Drain through the world market is real. East Asia, internal class, and postcolonial states show that satellites are not doomed copies. Use Frank as a warning, not as a complete map.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What are the theoretical models of societal power ? Which one of them is most applicable in advanced industrial societies ?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2019 · Q6(b)). View answer →
-
Did Frank deny any growth in the south?
He denied that such growth equals autonomous development. Enclaves can grow while the structure stays dependent.
-
Is 1991 India a refutation?
Liberalisation changed the mix. It did not erase hierarchical global production.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Assess critically A. G. Frank's theory of development of underdevelopment'
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Sociology
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer
Sociology
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.