Revision summary
Dominant forms of major religions have organised male sacred and legal authority. Hindu dharma, Abrahamic clergy, Buddhist nun rules, and Confucian kinship illustrate. Goddess cults, women saints, and reform block a total “all”. Walby and feminist theology name the structure without freezing it. NFHS tracks outcomes; revival often re-inscribes patriarchy.
Model answer
Introduction
Patriarchy here means organised male authority over women in law, ritual, property, and the sacred story. Most historically dominant world religions have been patriarchal in that sense. “All” is too clean. Internal dissent, goddess cults, and reform complicate a single yes.
Body
A careful yes on the main formations
- Classical Hindu dharma texts ranked women with dependents. Temple priesthood and coparcenary were long male. Bhakti and later reform still fought that grain.
- Abrahamic traditions coded God, prophecy, and clergy as male in their dominant forms. Islamic family law and Catholic priesthood illustrate institutional male gatekeeping.
- Buddhist sangha included nuns, yet the eight garudhammas and androcentric scriptures show a hierarchy. Confucian kinship was explicitly patriarchal.
Why “all” overreaches
- Shakta and village goddess traditions place female sacred power at the centre, even when everyday kinship stays male-headed.
- Sufi and bhakti women saints, and Quaker or some Protestant equal ministries, show counter-currents.
- Sylvia Walby’s structures of patriarchy can sit inside a religion without exhausting it. Max Weber’s theodicy and charisma also produce female founders.
Feminist substantiation
- Mary Daly and later feminist theology read the monotheisms as sacralising male rule.
- Leela Dube and Indian feminist work tied purity, marriage, and caste to religious honour.
- Census religion tables do not measure patriarchy, but NFHS on mobility, son preference, and decision-making tracks gendered outcomes across communities.
Contemporary mix
- Personal law reform, women’s entry to some priesthoods, and court cases on temple entry show religion as a field of struggle, not a frozen yes.
- Fundamentalist revival often re-sacralises male control. That is evidence of patriarchy, not of a timeless essence.
Answer
- Dominant historical forms of the world religions have been patriarchal.
- They are not patriarchal in every strand, every period, or every local cult.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD WR[World religions] --> CORE[Clerical legal cores] CORE --> PAT[Patriarchal order] DIS[Goddess bhakti reform] --> EXC[Exceptions and struggle] NFHS[Gender outcomes] --> PAT
Conclusion
- A substantiated answer is: largely yes for the classic clerical and legal cores; not yes for every goddess cult, mystic current, or reform. Walby, Weber, and Indian feminist ethnography keep the claim empirical. NFHS outcomes show the social harvest of those cores.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Does a goddess tradition free women?
Sacred female power can coexist with restricted wives. Look at property and priesthood, not only the idol.
-
Is secularism automatically non-patriarchal?
No. The state and the market can be patriarchal without a temple.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'? -
2019 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the probability sampling strategies with examples -
2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Mead, "We play a key role in our own socialization." -
2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Bring out the significance of Ethnography in social research -
2019 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'reserve army of labour' ? Present the position of feminist scholars on this -
2019 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the importance of interpretative understanding of social phenomena and explain its limitations -
2019 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What, according to Irawati Karve, are the Major difference between North Indian and South Indian Kinship system?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline
Sociology
Sociology emerged when industry, the state, and revolution made society a problem. Enlightenment comparison and Saint-Simon–Comte positivism supplied permission. Nisbet’s conservative themes of community and authority also fed the field. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber turned the name into a discipline. Census offices made method a public craft.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss
Stratification and Mobility: Concepts
Davis and Moore: unequal rewards fill important roles; the device is unconscious. Tumin: importance is politically defined. Marx and Weber add exploitation, status, and party. Caste and gender close talent before sorting begins. Use the thesis for incentives; do not use it as a full theory of inequality.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?
Sociology
Fetishism of commodities: social relations among producers appear as relations among things. Exchange-value hides labour time as price. The illusion is socially real, not a personal superstition. Lukács extended it as reification. Gig pay and piece-rates still carry the appearance.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.