Revision summary
Labour commitment is stable attachment of time and skill to the workplace. Kerr’s industrialism thesis expected it to grow. Indian mill and Breman studies found circulation and rural-caste ties. Braverman and Burawoy stress control and manufactured consent. Employers may organise against full commitment.
Model answer
Introduction
Labour commitment is the extent to which workers stably attach time, skill, and loyalty to an industrial workplace. Early industrial sociology asked why commitment failed in new factories. Later work asked whether management wanted full commitment at all.
Body
The concept
- Commitment includes showing up, learning the job, and accepting industrial time.
- It is social, not a natural work ethic. Max Weber’s calling is one cultural source; hunger and contract are others.
Manufacturing studies
- Clark Kerr and colleagues pictured a logic of industrialism that would produce committed labour.
- Indian mill studies, including those around Bombay and Jamshedpur, found rural links, caste recruitment, and circulating labour rather than a full break.
- Jan Breman’s work on south Gujarat showed footloose labour: management may prefer a non-committed, easily dismissed workforce.
- Harry Braverman: deskilling reduces the need for craft commitment and raises the need for control.
- Michael Burawoy distinguished making out on the shop floor: consent is produced, not assumed.
Discussion
- High commitment was a Fordist wish in some cores.
- Informalised manufacturing uses contractors precisely to limit commitment on the employer’s side.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD LC[Labour commitment] --> TIME[Stable industrial time] MILL[Manufacturing studies] --> MIX[Caste village contractors] MGT[Management] --> WANT[Sometimes wants non-commitment] MIX --> LC
Conclusion
Labour commitment names stable attachment to industrial work. Manufacturing studies show it is produced by culture, wage, and control, and often avoided through circulation and contractors. Indian mills never fully matched the committed industrial-man thesis.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What, according to Pareto, are the basic characteristics of elites? Discuss.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is absenteeism proof of low commitment?
It may reflect harvest, illness, or a second job. Read the labour regime first.
-
Do unions raise commitment?
They can raise attachment by making the job worth keeping. They can also organise exit.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism -
2018 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain Durkheim's basic arguments on suicide. Can you analyse high suicide rates of contemporary Indian society with Durkheim's theory? -
2018 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Evaluate if social stratification is functional for society. -
2018 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is the difference between anomie in Merton and Durkheim? Explain. -
2018 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Schooling does not ensure upward mobility of all members of this society. Discuss with reference in class societies. -
2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How can Parsons' AGIL framework be used to analyse key problems is a society? Discuss. -
2018 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"The sociological imagination enables us to grasp SOCIOLOGY and biography and the relationship between the two in society." - C.W.Mills . Explain. -
2018 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
In what way did Durkheim perceive religion as functional to society?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense?
Sociology
Sociology focuses on interaction as action oriented to others. Weber, Mead, and Goffman named that object. Common sense is Schutz’s unexamined stock of typifications. Durkheim’s rates and caste studies show why everyday talk is not enough. Sociology uses common-sense language and then tests it.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Weber split value-relevance of the problem from value-discipline in proof. The question of modern capitalism is culturally selected. The claimed fact is elective affinity with inner-worldly asceticism. Ideal types organise the comparison. The book does not preach Calvinism as a duty.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work
Sociology
Yes: I and Me are central in Mead. Me is the organised attitudes of others, the self as object. I is the unpredictable response that allows novelty. Play, game, and generalised other form the Me. Blumer’s interactionism inherits the pair.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.