Revision summary
Pareto: elites are the highest in any activity, governing and non-governing. They circulate; aristocracies die. Lions use force and persistence; foxes use combination and cunning. Derivations are the stories they tell. Mills and Indian caste-class closure qualify the psychology.
Model answer
Introduction
Vilfredo Pareto treated elites as the highest stratum in any field of activity, circulating rather than disappearing. Their basic characteristics are superiority of talent in that field, use of force and persuasion, and a mix of residues that he labelled lions and foxes.
Body
Who the elite are
- A small governing elite plus a non-governing elite of talent in other spheres.
- Not a moral elect. Elite means the best at a given activity, including crime.
Basic characteristics
- Circulation: elites decay and are replaced; history is a graveyard of aristocracies.
- Residues: Class I combination (foxes, cunning, innovation) and Class II persistence of aggregates (lions, force, tradition).
- Derivations: the justifications elites tell, which are not the real motors.
- Use of force and fraud; foxes who cannot use force fall to lions.
- Psychic and social heterogeneity: the mass is not a uniform people in the Rousseau sense.
Discussion
- Pareto criticised both Marxist class monopoly and democratic self-rule as derivations.
- C. Wright Mills later named a power elite of institutions, more structural than residues.
- Indian illustration: a political fox-like combinational elite beside a force-backed local lion stratum; circulation through elections is partial.
Limit
- Residue psychology underplays property and caste as durable closure.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD EL[Elite top stratum] --> CIRC[Circulation] EL --> L[Lions force] EL --> F[Foxes cunning] DER[Derivations] --> JUST[Public justifications]
Conclusion
Pareto’s elites are the top performers who rule by force and cunning, circulate, and justify themselves with derivations. Lions and foxes are the basic types. Use the scheme for circulation; add class and caste that Pareto thinned out.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"The sociological imagination enables us to grasp SOCIOLOGY and biography and the relationship between the two in society." - C.W.Mills . Explain.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Did Pareto deny democracy?
He treated it as a derivation that still hides elite rule.
-
Is every talented person elite?
In his definition, elite is the top of a stratified activity, not a scattered talent.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense? -
2018 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work -
2018 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Does the collapse of functionalism and bankruptcy of Marxism coincide with the rupture of modernity? Discuss. -
2018 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define patriarchy. How does patriarchy manifest in interpersonal relations? -
2018 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Marx, how are human beings alienated from their human potential and what does he suggest to change this? -
2018 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is the theory of cultural lag valid in present times? Discuss -
2018 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain with examples, the explanatory and exploratory designs of social research. -
2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense?
Sociology
Sociology focuses on interaction as action oriented to others. Weber, Mead, and Goffman named that object. Common sense is Schutz’s unexamined stock of typifications. Durkheim’s rates and caste studies show why everyday talk is not enough. Sociology uses common-sense language and then tests it.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Weber split value-relevance of the problem from value-discipline in proof. The question of modern capitalism is culturally selected. The claimed fact is elective affinity with inner-worldly asceticism. Ideal types organise the comparison. The book does not preach Calvinism as a duty.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work
Sociology
Yes: I and Me are central in Mead. Me is the organised attitudes of others, the self as object. I is the unpredictable response that allows novelty. Play, game, and generalised other form the Me. Blumer’s interactionism inherits the pair.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.