Revision summary
Ogburn: material culture leads, adaptive culture lags. Gig law, privacy, and bioethics still show that gap. Marx and Weber deny that technology is an uncaused first mover. Movements can lead or block adoption. Valid as strain theory, not as determinism.
Model answer
Introduction
William Ogburn’s cultural lag says material culture, especially technology, changes first and adaptive culture of norms, law, and family trails. The theory is still valid as a diagnostic of strain. It is invalid as a one-way law of gadgets over society.
Body
What still holds
- Digital platforms arrived faster than labour law, privacy, and gig social security.
- Medical technology outran ethics of surrogacy, data, and end-of-life.
- Green Revolution and now climate tools moved faster than agrarian institutions.
Limits in present times
- Karl Marx already made relations of production steer which technologies are adopted.
- Max Weber’s rationalisation is a cultural engine, not a lagging tail.
- Social movements can lead: environmental norms sometimes block a dam or a gene crop before full deployment.
- Gendered unpaid care, after Ann Oakley, may intensify with new gadgets that raise housekeeping standards.
Verdict
- Valid as a middle-range notice of mismatched tempos.
- Invalid as technological determinism.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MAT[Material technology] --> LAG[Adaptive norms law] POW[Class state movements] --> MAT LAG --> STRAIN[Present strain gig data]
Conclusion
Cultural lag remains a useful name for law and norms trailing digital and biomedical change. Present times also show culture and power steering technology. Use Ogburn as a warning, not as a master key.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain with examples, the explanatory and exploratory designs of social research.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q6(c)). View answer →
-
Does every new app prove cultural lag?
Only if norms and law are actually slower. Some apps follow already marketised culture.
-
Can lag be reduced?
Anticipatory regulation and public debate can shorten it; they do not delete mismatch.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense? -
2018 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work -
2018 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Does the collapse of functionalism and bankruptcy of Marxism coincide with the rupture of modernity? Discuss. -
2018 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define patriarchy. How does patriarchy manifest in interpersonal relations? -
2018 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Marx, how are human beings alienated from their human potential and what does he suggest to change this? -
2018 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain with examples, the explanatory and exploratory designs of social research. -
2018 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What, according to Pareto, are the basic characteristics of elites? Discuss. -
2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Sociology
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer
Sociology
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.