Q8(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q8(a) Q1(d) →

In what way did Durkheim perceive religion as functional to society?

Topic: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx. Syllabus: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx — Historical materialism, mode of production, alienation, class struggle; Emile Durkheim — Division of labour, social fact, suicide, religion and society; Max Weber — Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism; Talcott Parsons — Social system, pattern variables; Robert K. Merton — Latent and manifest functions, conformity and deviance, reference groups; Mead — Self and identity. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2018 and Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx.

Revision summary

Durkheim: religion is society in sacred form. Functions: integration, regulation, cognitive categories, continuity. Effervescence and church make the force felt as external. He did not predict a simple end of religion. Marx, caste, and gender limit the harmony of that function.

Model answer

Introduction

Emile Durkheim perceived religion as society worshipping its own ideal. Its function is to create, renew, and moralise solidarity. Gods are real as social forces, not as private errors.

Body

Core perception

  • In The Elementary Forms, religion is beliefs and practices relative to the sacred, uniting a church.
  • Collective effervescence generates the feeling of an external force, which is the group.
  • The sacred–profane split classifies the world and protects the group’s ideal.

Functions named

  • Integration: a moral community, from clan to nation.
  • Regulation: rites and interdicts discipline conduct, related to his suicide types.
  • Cognitive: categories of time, space, and cause are socially forged in ritual, a strong claim.
  • Continuity: funerals and commemorations bind generations.

What “functional” does not mean here

  • It does not mean every priest is useful to every class. Karl Marx’s veil is a different problem Durkheim underplayed.
  • It does not predict simple secular disappearance; he expected new cults, including the individual.

Later use

  • Robert Bellah’s civil religion is a functional reading of national ritual.
  • Gendered and caste temples show the moral community is stratified.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  REL[Religion] --> S[Sacred ritual]
  S --> E[Effervescence]
  E --> F[Solidarity regulation categories]
  F --> SOC[Society’s ideal]

Conclusion

Durkheim saw religion as functionally producing solidarity, moral regulation, and basic categories through sacred ritual. The function is for the group’s ideal. It is not a full theory of salvation, inequality, or inner faith.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Critically analyse Talcott Parsons conception of pattern variable'

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q1(d)). View answer →

  • Did Durkheim reduce religion to a trick?

    He treated it as true as a social force, false if read as a supernatural being apart from society.

  • Can sport replace religion in his sense?

    It can supply effervescence. A full church and sacred system are more than a match day.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

    View answer →

  2. 2018 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Explain Durkheim's basic arguments on suicide. Can you analyse high suicide rates of contemporary Indian society with Durkheim's theory?

    View answer →

  3. 2018 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Evaluate if social stratification is functional for society.

    View answer →

  4. 2018 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    What is the difference between anomie in Merton and Durkheim? Explain.

    View answer →

  5. 2018 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Schooling does not ensure upward mobility of all members of this society. Discuss with reference in class societies.

    View answer →

  6. 2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    How can Parsons' AGIL framework be used to analyse key problems is a society? Discuss.

    View answer →

  7. 2018 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    What is labour commitment? Discuss it with reference to studies of manufacturing industry.

    View answer →

  8. 2018 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    "The sociological imagination enables us to grasp SOCIOLOGY and biography and the relationship between the two in society." - C.W.Mills . Explain.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.

Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.