Revision summary
Parsonian functionalism collapsed under conflict and 1960s critique. Marxism faced 1989, missing polarisation, and gender-race gaps. Lyotard named the fall of metanarratives as a postmodern rupture. Giddens and Beck describe radicalised or reflexive modernity, not an end. Indian capitalism and caste show modern structures still at work.
Model answer
Introduction
From the 1960s, Parsonian functionalism lost authority and Marxist certainties split or stalled. Postmodern and late-modern writers called this a rupture of modernity. The coincidence is partial. Institutions of capitalism, state, and science did not end when the two grand theories wobbled.
Body
Collapse of functionalism
- Talcott Parsons’ system over-integrated conflict and history.
- C. Wright Mills, Ralf Dahrendorf, and later phenomenology accused it of a conservative consensus myth.
- 1960s movements made “system needs” look tone-deaf.
Bankruptcy charges against Marxism
- Actually existing socialism, 1989, and missing polarisation in rich capitalism damaged a textbook sequence.
- The New Left, feminism, and race studies said class did not exhaust domination.
- Cultural Marxists and world-systems theory, after Immanuel Wallerstein, were reconstructions, not a simple death.
Rupture of modernity?
- Jean-François Lyotard named incredulity toward metanarratives, including functional progress and Marxist emancipation.
- Zygmunt Bauman’s liquid modernity and Ulrich Beck’s reflexive modernity describe a changed, not ended, modern.
- Anthony Giddens: modernity radicalises, it does not politely close.
Why coincidence is overstated
- Max Weber’s iron cage and rationalisation already doubted both consensus and redemptive history.
- Indian liberalisation, informal labour, and caste politics show modern institutions thickening, not a postmodern holiday.
- Feminist and Dalit theory criticised both functionalism and orthodox Marxism without leaving modernity’s questions of rights and the state.
Discussion
- Intellectual collapse of two school orthodoxies did coincide with a crisis of modern self-confidence.
- That is not the same as the end of modern structures.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD FUN[Functionalism collapse] --> CRISIS[Crisis of grand theory] MARX[Marxism crisis] --> CRISIS CRISIS --> TALK[Rupture talk] INST[Capital state science] --> CONT[Modernity continues] TALK --> PART[Partial coincidence]
Conclusion
Functionalism’s fall and Marxism’s crisis travelled with a rupture in modern self-description. They did not prove that modernity itself ended. Weber, Giddens, and Indian capitalist-caste modernity show continuity with new risks and voices.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Define patriarchy. How does patriarchy manifest in interpersonal relations?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q3(b)). View answer →
-
If Marxism is bankrupt, is class dead?
Class analysis continues in informal labour and global production. The party-state script failed.
-
Is India postmodern?
It has postmodern culture in pockets. Its state, census, and markets remain modern apparatuses.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense? -
2018 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work -
2018 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define patriarchy. How does patriarchy manifest in interpersonal relations? -
2018 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Marx, how are human beings alienated from their human potential and what does he suggest to change this? -
2018 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is the theory of cultural lag valid in present times? Discuss -
2018 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain with examples, the explanatory and exploratory designs of social research. -
2018 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What, according to Pareto, are the basic characteristics of elites? Discuss. -
2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Sociology
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer
Sociology
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.