Q6(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q6 Q7 →

Examine the dynamics of pressure group in multi-party political system

Topic: Politics and Society. Syllabus: Politics and Society: Sociological theories of power; Power elite, bureaucracy, pressure groups, and political parties; Nation, state, citizenship, democracy, civil society, ideology; Protest, agitation, social movements, collective action, revolution. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2017 and Politics and Society.

Revision summary

Pressure groups influence without taking office. Multi-party coalitions multiply access points. Pluralist balance is limited by biased organisation. India: caste, farmer, and business groups in a federal party maze. Informal labour remains weakly grouped.

Model answer

Introduction

Pressure groups seek to influence policy without themselves forming the government. In a multi-party system they find several doors: coalition partners, standing committees, and rival channels of patronage. Dynamics are access, competition, and capture.

Body

Dynamics of access

  • David Truman and later pluralists pictured groups as a balance. C. Wright Mills and Marxist critics pictured biased access for business.
  • Multi-party coalitions raise the value of small allies and of street veto.

Indian multi-party field

  • Caste associations, farmer unions, chambers of commerce, and professional bodies bargain with regional parties.
  • Federalism multiplies venues: state capital and Centre.
  • Identity groups may become parties, so the border with a pressure group is leaky.

Risks

  • Clientelism and veto by organised minorities of the well-off.
  • Unorganised informal labour has weak group voice, which PLFS informality already suggests.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  PG[Pressure groups] --> MP[Multi-party doors]
  MP --> COAL[Coalition bargaining]
  PG --> BIAS[Organised bias]
  UN[Unorganised labour] --> WEAK[Weak voice]

Conclusion

In multi-party systems, pressure groups shop among parties and levels of government. The dynamic is more doors and more bias toward those already organised. India shows caste, farm, and business groups using that maze.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2018 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Discuss the challenges thrown by religious revivalism to a secular nation-state.

    View answer →

  2. 2018 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Are social movements primordial in means and progressive in agenda? Explain

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the importance of 'power elite' in democracy.

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Examine the role of protest movements in changing the status of Dalits in India.

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    To what extent revolution replaces the existing order of society? Discuss.

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    "Ideology is crucial for social transformation in a democracy." Discuss.

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Explain the conditions under which a collective action transforms into a social movement.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper

Sociology

Sociology arose as a science of society after industry and revolution. Comte named it; Durkheim, Marx, and Weber gave it method and objects. Rationality is both a method and, in Weber, a historical process. Scientific temper uses comparison, rates, and social facts. The Census later became a public file for that temper.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism

Sociology as Science

Positivism measures external facts; these perspectives study meaning and members’ methods. Schutz described the everyday life-world of typifications. Garfinkel showed order as accomplished, indexical work. Berger and Luckmann treated institutions as objectivated meanings. The critique qualifies rates; it does not delete official files.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.