Revision summary
Conflict causes change when it rewrites class, domination, or law (Marx, Weber, movements). Change causes conflict when regulation lags and new claimants appear (Durkheim, Ogburn, Merton). Coser: conflict can also integrate. Parsons’s equilibrium underplays the causal arrow from conflict. Explain both directions with Indian industrial and Mandal illustrations.
Model answer
Introduction
Social conflict is a struggle over values, resources, or honour. Social change is a transformation of structure. Conflict produces change when it rewrites rules. Change produces conflict when new groups and strains appear.
Body
Conflict as cause of change
- Karl Marx: class struggle is the motor that can transform a mode of production.
- Max Weber: charismatic rupture and party struggle recast legitimate domination.
- Social movements turn collective action into new law, as in labour and feminist gains after Ann Oakley made care public.
Change as cause of conflict
- Emile Durkheim: a new division of labour without moral regulation yields anomie and conflict.
- William F. Ogburn’s cultural lag: technique outruns norms, then fights over law.
- Robert K. Merton: new goals and blocked means produce deviant conflict.
- Industrialisation and Mandal-type office change in India generated caste and class conflicts as consequences.
Both, not a circle empty of content
- Lewis Coser, after Georg Simmel, argued that conflict can integrate as well as split.
- Talcott Parsons underplayed conflict as a cause; the statement corrects that calm.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CON[Social conflict] --> CH[Social change] CH --> CON MARX[Class struggle] --> CH LAG[New strains anomie] --> CON
Conclusion
Conflict causes change when it reorganises production, domination, or law. Change causes conflict when new strains and claimants appear. Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Merton explain the two arrows. Neither arrow is automatic success.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Globalization has pushed the labour into informal organization of work." Substantiate your answer with suitable examples.
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is all conflict progressive?
No. It can restore domination or destroy without a new order.
-
Can there be change without conflict?
Incremental differentiation happens. Large redistributions of power rarely do.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is civil society ? Present a note on civil society engagement with science and technology policy in India -
2017 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Assess the role of mass media as an agent of social change -
2017 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine any two theories of social change in detail society -
2017 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically analyse the role of science and technology in bringing about social change -
2016 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
"Social change can be brought about through development." Illustrate. from the contemporary situation of India. -
2016 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the contemporary trends in family as a response to social change in modern society. -
2016 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"Education is a major source of social mobility in contemporary society." Explain. -
2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the relevance of the idea of 'cultural lag' in understanding social change.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Sociology is pre-eminently study of modern societies." Discuss
Religion and Society
Sociology emerged to explain industrial, political, and secular modern order. Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Mead, and Parsons mapped that object. Comparison with other types is a method, not a betrayal. Colonial India is inside modernity’s history, not outside sociology. Discuss: pre-eminently modern, not exclusively the contemporary West.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'value-free sociology'? Clarify
Sociology as Science
Value-free sociology is Weber’s split: values choose questions; proof stays disciplined. It is not Comte’s moral church, not Marx’s fusion of theory and practice, not a view from nowhere. Durkheim’s files, Mead’s interaction, and Harding’s standpoint show the strain. Clarify: a rule of demonstration, not a ban on moral topics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze the importance of qualitative methods in social research
Research Methods and Analysis
Qualitative methods recover meaning, process, and context. Weber, Mead, Blumer, Geertz, and Merton justify that object. They reach hidden groups and latent functions that tables miss. They still need triangulation and comparison. Importance is complementarity with Census and survey magnitudes.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.