Revision summary
Sociology emerged to explain industrial, political, and secular modern order. Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Mead, and Parsons mapped that object. Comparison with other types is a method, not a betrayal. Colonial India is inside modernity’s history, not outside sociology. Discuss: pre-eminently modern, not exclusively the contemporary West.
Model answer
Introduction
- Sociology was born as a science of the modern: industry, the nation-state, class, and a worldly explanation of order. The statement is historically fair as origin. It is too narrow as a permanent object, because modernity is studied through contrast with other types.
Body
Why the claim arose
- Auguste Comte and the French Revolution made post-traditional order the puzzle.
- Karl Marx centred capitalist modernity as a mode of production.
- Max Weber asked why rationalisation densified in the Occident.
- Emile Durkheim studied the division of labour as a modern solidarity problem, using simpler types as a foil.
What “pre-eminently” should mean
- The classic questions are urban, industrial, bureaucratic, and secularising societies.
- George Herbert Mead’s self in the city, and Talcott Parsons’s differentiated subsystems, are modern maps.
Limits of the slogan
- Historical and anthropological comparison are internal to the discipline, as Weber’s religions and Durkheim’s totemism show.
- Colonial and Indian caste–agrarian worlds are modern in being transformed by empire, Census, and market, not only as “tradition”.
- Robert K. Merton’s middle-range work can study a factory or a village school with the same tools.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MOD[Modern society] --> SOC[Sociology's birth questions] COMP[Historical comparison] --> SOC SOC --> NOW[Still mostly modern objects]
Conclusion
Sociology is pre-eminently a child of modern society and still spends most of its energy there. It is not only a description of the West’s present. Marx, Weber, and Durkheim already needed other types to know what was new.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What is 'value-free sociology'? Clarify
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Should sociology ignore tribes and villages?
No. It studies them with modern concepts and as parts of modern states and markets.
-
Is the statement Eurocentric?
It is if modernity is monopolised by Europe. It is useful if modernity is a global historical type.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Give your comments on the growth of religious revivalism in the present day context -
2020 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically Analyse Durkheim's views on elementary forms of religious life and role of religion Also discuss the consequences of religious revivalism in contemporary society. -
2020 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
State the reasons for the various religious beliefs and practices in pre-modern societies. -
2018 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is sects? Discuss their role in multi-religious societies with empirical examples. -
2017 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Elaborate on various types of religious practices prevalent in India society -
2016 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is religion playing an important role in increasing fundamentalism? Give reasons for your answer. -
2016 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"Religious pluralism is the order of present-day societies." Explain by giving suitable examples. -
2015 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between sects and cults with illustrations.
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'value-free sociology'? Clarify
Sociology as Science
Value-free sociology is Weber’s split: values choose questions; proof stays disciplined. It is not Comte’s moral church, not Marx’s fusion of theory and practice, not a view from nowhere. Durkheim’s files, Mead’s interaction, and Harding’s standpoint show the strain. Clarify: a rule of demonstration, not a ban on moral topics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze the importance of qualitative methods in social research
Research Methods and Analysis
Qualitative methods recover meaning, process, and context. Weber, Mead, Blumer, Geertz, and Merton justify that object. They reach hidden groups and latent functions that tables miss. They still need triangulation and comparison. Importance is complementarity with Census and survey magnitudes.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Evaluate Marx's ideas on mode of production
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Mode of production: forces plus relations, historically specific surplus. It explains manor versus factory and class as a relation. Strength: historical type for capitalism and its predecessors. Limits: sacred, self, status, and unpaid gender labour need other tools. Evaluate: necessary, not a master key for all social life.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.