Revision summary
Development can rewrite production, welfare, and everyday roles. India: growth, schemes, SHGs, digital state, NFHS fertility and schooling. Marx, Parsons, and Mead explain structural and self change. Weber, Durkheim, and Merton explain surviving status, anomie, and latent inequality. Illustration: real change, not automatic equality.
Model answer
Introduction
Development is planned improvement of production, welfare, and capabilities, usually by the state and market. It can bring social change. In contemporary India it also reproduces caste, class, and gender unless those are named as targets.
Body
How development changes society
- Karl Marx: a shift in productive forces and relations is social change, whether called development or accumulation.
- Talcott Parsons: differentiation of economy, school, and law is a developmental path.
- Education, health, and infrastructure rewrite everyday time, mobility, and the self, in George Herbert Mead’s sense of new generalised others.
Contemporary Indian illustrations
- Liberalisation and growth expanded a consumer middle class and urban work, a class change.
- Rural roads, MGNREGA, and mobiles changed women’s public presence in some regions, still constrained by patriarchy.
- SHGs and microcredit made women visible as economic actors, with mixed control over funds.
- Digital payments and Aadhaar reorganised the state’s reach, a Weberian intensification of files.
- NFHS shows fertility decline and schooling gains: demographic and gender change tied to development services.
Limits of the slogan
- Development without land and labour rights can be dispossession, which Marx would not call emancipation.
- Caste remains in hiring and marriage despite GDP. Max Weber’s status outlasts income.
- Emile Durkheim’s anomie appears in boom cities: more division of labour, weaker regulation.
- Robert K. Merton: manifest growth, latent inequality and cultural lag in Ogburn’s sense.
- Environmental harm and informal work show change that is not simply “up”.
Illustration judged
- Yes, development has brought occupational, demographic, and state-capacity change in India.
- It is not an automatic solvent of hierarchy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DEV[Development] --> CH[Occupational demographic state change] DEV --> INEQ[Latent inequality] IND[India growth schemes NFHS] --> CH CASTE[Caste gender land] --> INEQ
Conclusion
Development can bring social change, and contemporary India shows that in work, fertility, schooling, and state files. Marx, Parsons, Weber, and Durkheim warn that growth, differentiation, and anomie travel together. Illustrate with gains and with persistent caste–gender closure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the contemporary trends in family as a response to social change in modern society.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q7(b)). View answer →
-
Is GDP growth the same as social change?
It can fund change. Without shifts in relations of caste, gender, and labour it is a narrow economic fact.
-
Can movements bring change without development?
Yes. Law and honour can shift through conflict. Development is one path, not the only one.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is civil society ? Present a note on civil society engagement with science and technology policy in India -
2017 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Assess the role of mass media as an agent of social change -
2017 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine any two theories of social change in detail society -
2017 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically analyse the role of science and technology in bringing about social change -
2016 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Social conflict is both a cause and a consequence of social change." Explain. -
2016 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the contemporary trends in family as a response to social change in modern society. -
2016 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"Education is a major source of social mobility in contemporary society." Explain. -
2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the relevance of the idea of 'cultural lag' in understanding social change.
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
To what extent can education and skill development be an agent of social change? Critically analyze.
Social Change in Modern Society
Durkheim and Parsons treat schooling as moral and role socialisation, a force of change. Human capital and capability approaches link skill to productivity and freedom. Bourdieu and correspondence theorists show reproduction of class through the school. Indian expansion of education has created new aspirations and some mobility. Coaching, English, caste and credential inflation limit the equalising effect. The extent is partial: necessary for change, insufficient as a sole agent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations
Social Change in Modern Society
Wallerstein takes the capitalist world-economy, not the nation, as the unit of analysis. Core, semi-periphery and periphery are linked positions in one division of labour. Development of the core has been historically tied to peripheral constraint. The theory criticises Rostow-style national stages and is cousin to Frank’s underdevelopment thesis. Criticisms include thin treatment of internal class, culture and new industrial cores. It remains a strong map of dependency, provided ranks are not treated as eternal.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change
Social Change in Modern Society
Social change is theorised as evolution, cycle, conflict, functional adaptation and global hierarchy. Unilinear evolution claims one sequence of stages for all societies. Comte, Morgan and some readings of Marx illustrate the ladder form. Limits include Eurocentrism, teleology and weak handling of collapse and mixture. Multilinear and dependency arguments were developed against that ladder. Differentiation can be kept as a theme without a compulsory staircase.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.